breast implant rupture
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

137
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Hudson ◽  
Richard K. J. Brown ◽  
Satoshi Minoshima ◽  
Dell Dunn

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. M. Lacerda ◽  
George Carvalho ◽  
Maria L. R. Uggioni ◽  
Daniela V. Bavaresco ◽  
Carla S. Simon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 255-260
Author(s):  
Helen J Trihia ◽  
Epthymia Souka ◽  
Gabriela Stanc ◽  
George Galanopoulos ◽  
Eleftheria Ignatiadou ◽  
...  

Background: Silicone lymphadenopathy is a recognized complication of silicone implant rupture. It occurs when silicone droplets migrate from breast implants to lymph nodes, resulting in the formation of granulomas (known as siliconoma) and lymph node enlargement. The ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes are most commonly involved but it can also affect contralateral axillary, supraclavicular, internal mammary and mediastinal lymph nodes.Case presentation: A 60-year-old woman with a history of left breast cancer who had undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) followed by left breast reconstruction with implant (30 years ago) presented with right axillary lymph nodes enlargement. An excisional biopsy of the two larger lymph nodes was performed to rule out malignancy. Pathologic examination showed features of silicone lymphadenopathy. Further examination with Ultrasound and MRI confirmed breast implant rupture. Conclusion: Silicone lymphadenopathy following breast augmentation and reconstruction primarily affects the ipsilateral axillary nodes. Contralateral lymph node involvement is rare and may occur several years after breast cancer diagnosis and can be the first sign of breast implant rupture. Although, the need to exclude malignancy in such cases is of outmost importance, silicone lymphadenopathy should also be considered in the differential diagnosis.


Author(s):  
Benedetta Fanelli ◽  
Marco Marcasciano ◽  
Stefano Lovero ◽  
Luca Codolini ◽  
Donato Casella ◽  
...  

AbstractNowadays silicone is a widespread material for medical devices. In particular, it is commonly used for implants manufacturing, for that patients undergoing breast augmentation or breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, the use of silicone implants is not free from risks. Ruptures of silicone breast implants are uncommon, in general post-traumatic or iatrogenic, and usually related to implant’s wall weakness of unknown origin but probably due to biochemical reactions that cause wall rupture. As a consequence of a rupture, silicone gel from damaged implants may have a continuity migration to the chest wall, axillae, and upper extremities, resulting in granulomatous inflammation or siliconoma, or a lymphatic migration to axillary lymph nodes. In this regard, silicone thoracic migration is extremely rare, and nowadays a leakage is unlikely to happen with more modern cohesive silicone gel implants. Nevertheless, procedures such as thoracic surgery and thoracotomies may be responsible for accidental breast implant rupture, capsular discontinuity, and eventually intrathoracic silicone migration, especially when dealing with older generations of breast implants. We report a rare case of a 75-year-old woman presenting with pleural silicone effusion, 18 years after a right breast reconstruction for breast cancer, followed by right upper lobe resection for a lung carcinoma. A combination of muscular flap and DTI pre-pectoral breast reconstruction with biological membrane (ADM) has been used for treatment. Literature was reviewed for cases of breast implants free silicone localization in the chest cavity, focusing on previous surgeries, anamnestic relevances, and surgical management.Level of Evidence: Level V, risk/prognostic study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 102673
Author(s):  
Antoine Gavoille ◽  
Michel Vincent ◽  
Lize Kiakouama ◽  
Mikael Catinon ◽  
Medhi Lamkhioued ◽  
...  

Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Andres Rivera ◽  
Carlota González-Pozega ◽  
Gorka Ibarra ◽  
Borja Fernandez-Ibarburu ◽  
Ángela García-Ruano ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Lipofilling techniques are widespread in clinical practice as a complement to breast reconstruction, despite posing some risk. Punctual implant rupture following a fat transfer is one of the possible complications, which has not been properly reported yet and is probably being underdiagnosed. The aim of this paper is to report key facts for appropriate diagnosis of this clinical chart.<i></i><b><i>Case Report:</i></b><i></i>We present the case of a 47-year-old woman with a bilateral prosthetic breast reconstruction who was treated with autologous fat graft for upper pole enhancing and scar improvement. The patient developed an early unilateral breast capsular contracture after the fat graft procedure, with normal radiological exploration. Surgical findings showed intraprosthetic fat deposits and a punctual implant rupture. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Punctual breast implant rupture is a possible complication of lipofilling that is usually not suspected at first consultation and might be underdiagnosed based on radiological findings, so investigating clinical signs should necessarily be a prerequisite to diagnosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9_2020 ◽  
pp. 248-254
Author(s):  
Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D. Zikiryakhodzhaev ◽  
Rasskazova E.A. Rasskazova ◽  
Omarova D.F. Omarova ◽  
Khugaeva F.S. Khugaeva ◽  
Skreptsova N.S. Skreptsova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-170
Author(s):  
A. A. Nekrasov ◽  
N. P. Korableva ◽  
N. S. Romanenkov ◽  
A. G. Grigoryan ◽  
Ya. V. Cekhmistro

The case report demonstrates the difficulties in the differential diagnosis between cases of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BI-ALCL) and rupture of the breast implant. Such patients examining algorithm should include breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, puncture of the breast under sonographic navigation, cytological examination of the obtained fluid. In cases of suspected BI-ALCL a total capsulectomy should be performed during surgery with subsequent histological, immunohistochemical examination of the removed tissue. The low incidence of BI-ALCL should not lead to a lack of caution regarding the verification of this neoplastic process by plastic surgeons and oncologists. If BI-ALCL is suspected, patients should be purposefully examined to confirm or exclude the diagnosis and surgeries are to be performed with the participation of an oncologist-mammologist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document