human cadaver study
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

68
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110642
Author(s):  
Gino Vissers ◽  
Wan M. R. Rusli ◽  
Alexander Scarborough ◽  
Maxim D. Horwitz ◽  
Gordon J. McArthur ◽  
...  

This human cadaver study investigated whether flexor tendon repairs performed with round-bodied needles had a higher risk of pull-out compared with those performed with cutting needles. Forty human cadaver tendons were repaired (20 with each type of needle), subjected to tensile traction testing and evaluated by failure load and mode of failure. The average failure load was 50 N (SD 13 N) for tendons repaired with round-bodied needles, compared with 49 N (SD 16 N) for tendons repaired with cutting needles. Round-bodied needles resulted in more suture pull-out (18 out of 20 tendons) than cutting needles (6 out of 20 tendons). We found no differences in failure load, but significant differences in the mode of failure between round-bodied and cutting needles when used for cadaveric flexor tendon repair.


2021 ◽  
pp. 103942
Author(s):  
E. Grecchi ◽  
L.V. Stefanelli ◽  
F. Grecchi ◽  
F. Grivetto ◽  
A. Franchina ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Francesco Grecchi ◽  
Luigi V. Stefanelli ◽  
Fabrizio Grivetto ◽  
Emma Grecchi ◽  
Rami Siev ◽  
...  

The aim of this human cadaver study was to assess the accuracy of zygomatic/pterygoid implant placement using custom-made bone-supported laser sintered titanium templates. For this purpose, pre-surgical planning was done on computed tomography scans of each cadaver. Surgical guides were printed using direct metal laser sintering technology. Four zygomatic and two pterygoid implants were inserted in each case using the guided protocol and related tools. Post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained to evaluate deviations between the planned and inserted implants. Accuracy was measured by overlaying the real position in the post-operative CT on the virtual presurgical placement of the implant in a CT image. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of the data were performed. As a result, a total of 40 zygomatic and 20 pterygoid implants were inserted in 10 cadavers. The mean deviations between the planned and the placed zygomatic and pterygoid implants were respectively (mean ± SD): 1.69° ± 1.12° and 4.15° ± 3.53° for angular deviation. Linear distance deviations: 0.93 mm ± 1.23 mm and 1.35 mm ± 1.45 mm at platform depth, 1.35 mm ± 0.78 mm and 1.81 mm ± 1.47 mm at apical plane, 1.07 mm ± 1.47 mm and 1.22 mm ± 1.44 mm for apical depth. In conclusion, the surgical guide system showed accuracy for all the variables studied and allowed acceptable and accurate implant placement regardless of the case complexity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-216
Author(s):  
Kerstin Schümann ◽  
Tamara Wilfling ◽  
Gerrit Paasche ◽  
Robert Schuon ◽  
Thomas Lenarz ◽  
...  

AbstractImpairment of Eustachian tube function with nonsufficient ventilation of the middle ear is a main cause for chronic otitis media. To provide an effective and safe therapy, the innovative concept of Eustachian tube stenting was established. Biodegradable polymeric stents are developed to restore impaired tube function and dissolve after fulfilling their supportive purpose. To evaluate the applicability of the stents in the Eustachian tube, prototypes in conjunction with corresponding implantation instruments were tested in human cadaver studies. Radiopaque markers and a diaphanoscopic approach were tested as additional features to prove correct positioning of catheter and stent in the tube. In the current study biodegradable polymeric stents were implanted in the Eustachian tube of human cadavers without difficulty. Correct positioning of the stents in the tube was proved by diaphanoscopy during intervention and postoperative tomographic and histological analyses. Once designs are optimized on the basis of cadaver studies, preclinical safety and efficacy studies using animal models will be initiated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1317-1322
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Hatzke ◽  
Francesca C. Daigle ◽  
Robert A. Augsburger ◽  
Matthew J. Kesterke ◽  
Poorya Jalali

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 961-968
Author(s):  
Stavros Oikonomidis ◽  
Martin Scaal ◽  
Peer Eysel ◽  
Jan Bredow ◽  
Max Joseph Scheyerer

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-399
Author(s):  
Lionel Bouvet ◽  
Neven Stevic ◽  
Eloïse Cercueil ◽  
Gabrielle Drevet ◽  
Dominique Chassard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document