Improving Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Lab Efficiency

Background Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (iPTH) testing is often used to confirm successful removal of hypersecreting parathyroid glands during parathyroidectomy. Unfortunately, the iPTH test can be a time-consuming and highly variable process that occurs while the patient is under anesthesia. We set out to improve iPTH lab efficiency and variability. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 85 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy at our institution from October 2017 to October 2019. Each step of the iPTH lab reporting process was recorded and analyzed. Three simulations were performed of the entire process. We then established interventions to modify inefficiencies in the process and studied 21 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy at our institution from November 2019 to March 2020. Results Twenty-five minutes of time inherent to the process were identified. Four critical steps were identified as modifiable steps in the process: 1. Operating room (OR) blood draw ---> lab receipt. 2. Lab receipt ---> placement on centrifuge. 3. Removal from centrifuge ---> placement on PTH machine. 4. PTH machine result ---> OR verbal report. We improved iPTH lab efficiency by 19%, decreasing the average lab result from 45 to 36 minutes ( P = .001). We improved iPTH lab variability by 62%, decreasing the standard deviation from 21 to 8 minutes ( P = .001). Discussion Utilizing a team-based approach to identify and expedite critical steps in the iPTH lab process can make a significant improvement in iPTH lab efficiency, improving patient care by decreasing total anesthesia time.

Effects of Parathyroidectomy on Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism and the Role of Intraoperative PTH Measurement

Background Normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NCpHPT) and normohormonal primary hyperparathyroidism (NHpHPT) are recently recognized variants of primary hyperparathyroidism. Current guidelines for the management hyperparathyroidism recognize NCpHPT as one of the areas that are recommended for more research due to limited available data. Methods A retrospective review of patients who had parathyroidectomy between 2014 and 2019. We excluded patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes and secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Included patients were classified based on the biochemical profile into classic or normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism group. Collected data included demographics, preoperative localizing imaging, intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels, and postoperative cure rates. Results 261 patients were included: 160 patients in the classic and 101 patients in the normocalcemic group. Patients in the normocalcemic group had significantly more negative sestamibi scans (n = 58 [8.2%] vs 78 [51.3%], P = <.01), smaller parathyroid glands (mean weight 436.0 ± 593.0 vs 742.4 ± 1109.0 mg, P = .02), higher parathyroid hyperplasia rates (n = 51 [50.5%] vs 69 [43.1%]), and significantly higher intraoperative parathyroid hormone at 10 minutes (78.1 ± 194.6 vs 43.9 ± 62.4 1, P = .04). Positive predictive value of both intraoperative parathyroid hormone and cure rate was lower in the normocalcemic group (84.2% vs 95.7%) and (80.5% vs 95%), respectively. Conclusion Normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism is a challenging disease. Surgeons should be aware of the lower cure rate in this group, interpret intraoperative parathyroid hormone with caution, and have a lower threshold for bilateral neck exploration and 4 glands visualization.

Evaluation of Autofluorescence in Identifying Parathyroid Glands by Measuring Parathyroid Hormone in Fine-Needle Biopsy Washings

Background: Near-infrared autofluorescence imaging has potentially great value for assisting endocrine surgeons in identifying parathyroid glands and may dramatically change the surgical strategy of endocrine surgeons in thyroid surgery. This study is designed to objectively evaluate the role of near-infrared autofluorescence imaging in identifying parathyroid glands during thyroid surgery by measuring intraoperative parathyroid hormone in fine-needle aspiration biopsy washings.Methods: A case series study was conducted at a tertiary referral teaching hospital in China from September 2019 to April 2020. Patients undergoing total thyroidectomy with or without neck lymph node dissection were consecutively included. The surgeon used near-infrared autofluorescence imaging to identify parathyroid glands during thyroid surgery and confirmed suspicious parathyroid tissues by measuring their intraoperative parathyroid hormone. Nanocarbon was injected into the thyroid gland if the thyroid autofluorescence intensity was too strong. The sensitivity and accuracy of near-infrared autofluorescence imaging and vision for identifying parathyroid glands, and the difference in autofluorescence intensity in various tissues were the main outcomes.RESULTS: Overall, 238 patients completed the trial. Based on the pathological and aIOPTH results, the sensitivity of near-infrared autofluorescence imaging for detecting parathyroid glands（568 of 596 parathyroid glands; 95.30%）was significantly higher than that of vision（517 of 596 parathyroid glands; 86.74%, P<.001). The accuracy of near-infrared autofluorescence imaging (764 of 841 tissues; 90.84%) was significantly higher than that of vision (567 of 841 tissues; 67.42%, P<.001) when the evaluations of certain tissues were inconsistent. There was a significant difference between the autofluorescence intensity of the parathyroid glands and that of the lymph nodes (74.19 ± 17.82 vs 33.97 ± 10.64, P<.001).CONCLUSIONS: The use of near-infrared autofluorescence imaging, along with intraoperative parathyroid hormone and nanocarbon for the identification of parathyroid glands in thyroid surgery may increase the number of confirmed parathyroid glands. Using near-infrared autofluorescence imaging can effectively distinguish lymph nodes and parathyroid glands during lymph node dissection.

Feasibility of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background and Objectives There has been a long debate on whether intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring is mandatory or not in the excision of a single abnormal parathyroid gland. The aim of this study is to suggest a new criteron of IOPTH monitoring. Subjects and Method We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy from 2005 to 2019. Patients had IOPTH not measured and those with secondary hyperparathyroidism were excluded. IOPTH was measured preoperatively (EX00), at 10 minutes (EX10) and 20 minutes (EX20) after the excision and analyzed. We determined the surgery as a ‘successful excision of lesion (SEOUL)’ when it met the following criteria: criterion 1) the level of EX10 or EX20 decreased under the upper normal or under upper limit of parathyroid hormone (65 pg/mL); criterion 2) EX20 decreased below 50% of EX00 and less than 195 pg/ mL (3 times the upper normal limit); criterion 3) multiglandular disease. Results Twenty-five patients among 31 patients were included this study (M:F=8:17). Twenty- two patients were suspected of single lesion and three patients of multiple lesions on preoperative images (99mTc-sestamibi scan, neck CT, and PET-CT). IOPTH of EX00, EX10, and EX20 were 488.92±658.74, 121.36±134.73, and 92.44±111.55 pg/mL, respectively. Sixty-four percent patients (16/25) met the criterion 1. Six patients (24%) successfully excised a lesion meeting the criterion 2. Three patients had multiglandular disease, meeting the criterion 3. Conclusion Our new criteria suggest when we could stop the procedure. If the level of IOPTH does not meet the SEOUL criteria, it means that there might be more lesions.