Improving Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Lab Efficiency

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110545
Author(s):  
John M. Pickering ◽  
Wesley H. Giles
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Verbal Report ◽  
Blood Draw ◽  
Reporting Process ◽  
Successful Removal ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Improving Patient Care ◽  
Anesthesia Time

Background Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (iPTH) testing is often used to confirm successful removal of hypersecreting parathyroid glands during parathyroidectomy. Unfortunately, the iPTH test can be a time-consuming and highly variable process that occurs while the patient is under anesthesia. We set out to improve iPTH lab efficiency and variability. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 85 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy at our institution from October 2017 to October 2019. Each step of the iPTH lab reporting process was recorded and analyzed. Three simulations were performed of the entire process. We then established interventions to modify inefficiencies in the process and studied 21 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy at our institution from November 2019 to March 2020. Results Twenty-five minutes of time inherent to the process were identified. Four critical steps were identified as modifiable steps in the process: 1. Operating room (OR) blood draw ---> lab receipt. 2. Lab receipt ---> placement on centrifuge. 3. Removal from centrifuge ---> placement on PTH machine. 4. PTH machine result ---> OR verbal report. We improved iPTH lab efficiency by 19%, decreasing the average lab result from 45 to 36 minutes ( P = .001). We improved iPTH lab variability by 62%, decreasing the standard deviation from 21 to 8 minutes ( P = .001). Discussion Utilizing a team-based approach to identify and expedite critical steps in the iPTH lab process can make a significant improvement in iPTH lab efficiency, improving patient care by decreasing total anesthesia time.

Does Rapid Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Analysis Predict Cure in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism?

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Nilsen ◽  
E. Haug ◽  
M. Heidemann ◽  
S. J. Karlsen
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Parathyroid Tissue ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Sestamibi Scintigraphy ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone

Background and Aims: Preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy is used by many surgeons to identify the anatomical location of pathological parathyroid glands in patients undergoing surgical treatment for hyperparathyroidism. However, false negative results do occur. It has been suggested that intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) analysis may enhance the possibility of performing successful focused, unilateral neck surgery in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether an adequate fall in intraoperative parathyroid hormone values predicts the removal of all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue and postoperative normocalcemia. Material and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing surgery for hyperparathyroidism had preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy and intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) analysis. A fall in intraoperative PTH value by more than 50% of baseline value ended the procedure. This prospective study presents the clinical and biochemical results. Results: The overall sensitivity of the 99mTc-sestamib scintigraphy was 88% and for single adenomas 95%. The scintigraphy failed to detect the correct pathology in all cases with multiglandular disease (7 patients). A fall in intraoperative PTH value by more than 50% of baseline value was achieved in all patients. The combination of intraoperative PTH analysis and 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy enabled us to limit the operation to a focused, unilateral operation in 87 of the 100 patients. All patients were normocalcemic postoperatively. Conclusions: A fall in intraoperative PTH value more than 50 % of baseline value seems to predict postoperative normocalcemia and the removal of all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue. Bilateral neck exploration is avoided in the majority of patients.

scholarly journals Disparity between Preoperative and Pre-Excisional Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone in Parathyroid Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 382-386
Author(s):  
Maheer Masood ◽  
Trevor Hackman
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Parathyroid Surgery ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Gland Function ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Clinic Visits

Introduction Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) testing is a widely accepted standard for assessing the parathyroid gland function. A decline of preoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels by more than 50% is one accepted measure of parathyroid surgery adequacy. However, there may be a variation between preoperative PTH levels obtained at a clinic visit and pre-excisional ioPTH. Objective Our study explores the differences between preoperative PTH and pre-excisional ioPTH levels, and the potential impact this difference has on determining the adequacy of parathyroid surgery. Methods A retrospective study that consisted of 33 patients that had undergone parathyroid resection between September 2009 and March 2016 at a tertiary academic center was performed. Each subject's preoperative PTH levels were obtained from clinic visits and pre-excisional ioPTH levels were recorded along with the time interval between the measurements. Results There was a significant difference between the mean preoperative PTH and the pre-excisional ioPTH levels of 147 pg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.43 to 284.47; p = 0.0396). The exclusion of four outliers revealed a further significant difference with a mean of 35.09 pg/mL (95% CI 20.27 to 49.92; p < 0.0001). The average time interval between blood draws was 48 days + 32 days. A weak correlation between the change in PTH values and the time interval between preoperative and pre-excision blood draws was noted (r2 = 0.15). Conclusion Our study reveals a significant difference between the preoperative PTH levels obtained at clinic visits and the pre-excisional intraoperative PTH levels. We recommend routine pre-excisional intraoperative PTH levels, despite evidence of elevated preoperative PTH levels, in order to more accurately assess the adequacy of surgical resection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document