elbow arthrolysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Xiao ◽  
Maoqi Gong ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Yejun Zha ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation. Methods We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation. Conclusion Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Xiao ◽  
Maoqi Gong ◽  
Chen chen ◽  
Yejun Zha ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analysed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our center from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results: The average follow-up time was 28.4±3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation. Conclusion: Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.



2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (2) ◽  
pp. 366-372
Author(s):  
Ziyang Sun ◽  
Juehong Li ◽  
Gang Luo ◽  
Feiyan Wang ◽  
Yuehao Hu ◽  
...  

Aims This study aimed to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) under distribution- and anchor-based methods for the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and range of movement (ROM) after open elbow arthrolysis (OEA). We also assessed the proportion of patients who achieved MCID and SCB; and identified the factors associated with achieving MCID. Methods A cohort of 265 patients treated by OEA were included. The MEPI and ROM were evaluated at baseline and at two-year follow-up. Distribution-based MDC was calculated with confidence intervals (CIs) reflecting 80% (MDC 80), 90% (MDC 90), and 95% (MDC 95) certainty, and MCID with changes from baseline to follow-up. Anchor-based MCID (anchored to somewhat satisfied) and SCB (very satisfied) were calculated using a five-level Likert satisfaction scale. Multivariate logistic regression of factors affecting MCID achievement was performed. Results The MDC increased substantially based on selected CIs (MDC 80, MDC 90, and MDC 95), ranging from 5.0 to 7.6 points for the MEPI, and from 8.2° to 12.5° for ROM. The MCID of the MEPI were 8.3 points under distribution-based and 12.2 points under anchor-based methods; distribution- and anchor-based MCID of ROM were 14.1° and 25.0°. The SCB of the MEPI and ROM were 17.3 points and 43.4°, respectively. The proportion of the patients who attained anchor-based MCID for the MEPI and ROM were 74.0% and 94.7%, respectively; furthermore, 64.2% and 86.8% attained SCB. Non-dominant arm (p = 0.022), higher preoperative MEPI rating (p < 0.001), and postoperative visual analogue scale pain score (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of not achieving MCID for the MEPI, while atraumatic causes (p = 0.040) and higher preoperative ROM (p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for ROM. Conclusion In patients undergoing OEA, the MCID for the increased MEPI is 12.2 points and 25° increased ROM. The SCB is 17.3 points and 43.3°, respectively. Future studies using the MEPI and ROM to assess OEA outcomes should report not only statistical significance but also clinical importance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):366–372.



2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 576-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyang Sun ◽  
Weixuan Liu ◽  
Juehong Li ◽  
Cunyi Fan

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging for upper limb surgeons. Open elbow arthrolysis is commonly used for the treatment of stiff elbow when conservative therapy has failed. Multiple questions commonly arise from surgeons who deal with this disease. These include whether the patient has post-traumatic stiff elbow, how to evaluate the problem, when surgery is appropriate, how to perform an excellent arthrolysis, what the optimal postoperative rehabilitation is, and how to prevent or reduce the incidence of complications. Following these questions, this review provides an update and overview of post-traumatic elbow stiffness with respect to the diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, arthrolysis strategies, postoperative rehabilitation, and prevention of complications, aiming to provide a complete diagnosis and treatment path. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:576–584.



Author(s):  
Alex Murray ◽  
Daniel LJ. Morris ◽  
Tim Cresswell ◽  
Marius Espag ◽  
Amol A. Tambe ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Erdem Özden ◽  
Kahraman Öztürk ◽  
Bilal Birkan Demir ◽  
Ahmet Utku Gürün ◽  
Murat Demiroğlu ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document