cookiecutter shark
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-499
Author(s):  
Mark A. Grace ◽  
Laura Aichinger Dias ◽  
Katherine Maze-Foley ◽  
Carrie Sinclair ◽  
Keith D. Mullin ◽  
...  

10.5597/00237 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Luis Felipe Silva Pereira Mayorga ◽  
Renata Cristina Campos Bhering ◽  
Renata Hurtado ◽  
Ralph Eric Thijl Vanstreels

We report four years (2012-2015) of consecutive observations of the same juvenile male Southern elephant seal along the coast Espírito Santo (ES), Brazil, identified based on scars of cookiecutter shark bites. In 2015 three bacteries were isolated from a recent lesion using routine methods of bacterial culture and identification, and a large number of barnacles were seen attached to the fur of other body regions, especially on the pelvic limbs and lower back. We collected 12 barnacles from different body areas, and identified all of them as Eared barnacles (Conchoderma aurita). Additionally, a sample of feces was obtained and analyzed through simple-flotation, revealing helminth eggs compatible with Contracaecum sp.


2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-588
Author(s):  
José Castro ◽  
Tomás Anllo ◽  
Jaime Mejuto ◽  
Blanca García

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Ebert ◽  
Catarina Pien ◽  
Daniel J. Kamikawa

The cookiecutter shark,Isistius brasiliensis, is confirmed for the first time from the eastern North Pacific Ocean. The shark, a female 432 mm in total length, was caught in a sablefish pot at a depth of 1132 m off San Nicolas Island, California, USA (32°59′05″N 120°25′99″W).


2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Hoyos-Padilla ◽  
Yannis P. Papastamatiou ◽  
John O'Sullivan ◽  
Christopher G. Lowe

Author(s):  
Hugo Bornatowski ◽  
Leonardo L. Wedekin ◽  
Michael R. Heithaus ◽  
Milton César C. Marcondes ◽  
Marcos R. Rossi-Santos

Although it is largely assumed that shark predation and predation risk are unimportant to large cetaceans, whales can make up large portions of the diets of some shark species. We investigated interactions between sharks and cetaceans in the Abrolhos Bank (16°40′ to 19°40′S), off the eastern coast of Brazil, including scavenging and predation attempts on living humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). In order to determine the frequency of shark bites on cetaceans, both living and postmortem, we used carcasses discovered along the coast of Abrolhos Bank between 2001 and 2010 and photographs of living cetaceans during systematic and opportunistic visual surveys from 2004 to 2009. We analysed a total of 221 cetacean carcasses, of which 150 (67.8%) were humpback whales. Large sharks had fed on 22.3% (35 of 150) of humpback whales carcasses, and 20.8% (10 of 48) of carcasses of other species. Only three living humpback whales (<1%) had bite scars from large sharks, suggesting that they at least occasionally target living humpbacks. Cookiecutter shark bite marks also were observed on both dead and living cetaceans, with numerous living humpbacks showing multiple bites. The abundance of humpback whale carcasses available over the Abrolhos Bank, mainly during the humpback breeding season, may be an important component of shark diets seasonally. Further work is needed to better understand the frequency of shark attacks on mysticetes, potential costs of sublethal injuries, and importance of whales to shark diets.


2011 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Honebrink ◽  
Robert Buch ◽  
Peter Galpin ◽  
George H. Burgess
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document