trainee development
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Brandon Kappy ◽  
Lisa E. Herrmann ◽  
Daniel J. Schumacher ◽  
Angela M. Statile

AbstractThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones and entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are important assessment approaches but may lack specificity for learners seeking improvement through daily feedback. As in other professions, clinicians grow best when they engage in deliberate practice of well-defined skills in familiar contexts. This growth is augmented by specific, actionable coaching from supervisors. This article proposes a new feedback modality called microskills, which are derived from the psychology, negotiation, and business literature, and are unique in their ability to elicit targeted feedback for trainee development. These microskills are grounded in both clinical and situational contexts, thereby mirroring learners’ cognitive schemas and allowing for more natural skill selection and adoption. When taken as a whole, microskills are granular actions that map to larger milestones, competencies, and EPAs. This article outlines the theoretical justification for this new skills-based feedback modality, the methodology behind the creation of clinical microskills, and provides a worked example of microskills for a pediatric resident on a hospital medicine rotation. Ultimately, microskills have the potential to complement milestones and EPAs and inform feedback that is specific, actionable, and relevant to medical learners.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. ar18
Author(s):  
Amanda R. Butz ◽  
Janet L. Branchaw

The Entering Research Learning Assessment (ERLA) measures undergraduate and graduate research trainee learning gains in the seven areas of trainee development described in the Entering Research conceptual framework. Validity evidence for the ERLA trainee self-assessment and mentor assessment of trainee learning gains and recommendations for use are presented.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 727-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M Klasen ◽  
Erik Driessen ◽  
Pim W Teunissen ◽  
Lorelei A Lingard

BackgroundLearning is in delicate balance with safety, as faculty supervisors try to foster trainee development while safeguarding patients. This balance is particularly challenging if trainees are allowed to experience the educational benefits of failure, acknowledged as a critical resource for developing competence and resilience. While other educational domains allow failure in service of learning, however, we do not know whether or not this strategy applies to clinical training.MethodsWe conducted individual interviews of clinical supervisors, asking them whether they allowed failure for educational purposes in clinical training and eliciting their experiences of this phenomenon. Participants’ accounts were descriptively analysed for recurring themes.ResultsTwelve women and seven men reported 48 specific examples of allowing trainee failure based on their judgement that educational value outweighed patient risk. Various kinds of failures were allowed: both during operations and technical procedures, in medication dosing, communication events, diagnostic procedures and patient management. Most participants perceived minimal consequences for patients, and many described their rescue strategies to prevent an allowed failure. Allowing failure under supervision was perceived to be important for supporting trainee development.ConclusionClinical supervisors allow trainees to fail for educational benefit. In doing so, they attempt to balance patient safety and trainee learning. The educational strategy of allowing failure may appear alarming in the zero-error tolerant culture of healthcare with its commitment to patient safety. However, supervisors perceived this strategy to be invaluable. Viewing failure as inevitable, they wanted trainees to experience it in protected situations and to develop effective technical and emotional responses. More empirical research is required to excavate this tacit supervisory practice and support its appropriate use in workplace learning to ensure both learning and safety.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison N. Ponce ◽  
Allison C. Aosved ◽  
Laura Yoviene Sykes ◽  
Claytie Davis ◽  
Ellen J. Teng

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kevin Dorsey ◽  
Austin M. Beason ◽  
Steven J. Verhulst

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document