research mentorship
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

58
(FIVE YEARS 31)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Ian Golding

Abstract This article examines the mentorship gap students face between the completion of a manuscript and its subsequent submission to a journal. Without continued faculty support, students often face unexpected hurdles as they enter the publication process. To alleviate these issues, the article discusses the value of extending undergraduate research mentorship.


Author(s):  
Hannah Franz ◽  
Anne Charity Hudley ◽  
Rachael Scarborough King ◽  
Kendra Calhoun ◽  
deandre miles-hercules ◽  
...  

Abstract The authors present a lab-based research model that engages graduate students in undergraduate research mentorship positions that are mutually beneficial for graduate students, undergraduates, and faculty. They show how this model can be scaled up and adapted across the range of English disciplines. The authors share examples of the different types of research that they have engaged in for linguistics, literary archival studies, creative writing, and writing pedagogy. These examples illustrate how undergraduate research mentorship can prepare graduate students to teach and mentor students using effective methods in various institutional contexts.


Author(s):  
Emmanuela Oppong ◽  
Huanyu Bao ◽  
Weiming Tang ◽  
María I. Echavarria Mejia ◽  
Franklin Glozah ◽  
...  

Research mentoring programs are limited in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The TDR Global initiated a global crowdsourcing open call soliciting proposals on how to improve research mentorship in LMICs. The purpose of this study is to examine ideas submitted to this open call to identify the ways to improve research mentorship in LMICs. Open calls have a group of individuals solve all or part of a problem and then share solutions. A WHO/TDR/SESH crowdsourcing guide was used to structure the open call. Each submission was judged by three independent individuals on a 1–10 scale. Textual submissions were extracted from eligible proposals and qualitatively analyzed via inductive and deductive coding techniques to identify themes. The open call received 123 submissions from 40 countries in Asia (49), Africa (38), Latin America (26), and Europe (10). Among all participants, 108 (87%) had research experience. A total of 21 submissions received a mean score of 7/10 or higher. Our thematic analysis identified three overarching themes related to prementoring, facilitation, and evaluation. Prementoring establishes mentor–mentee compatibility to lay foundations for mentorship. Facilitation involves iterative cycles of planning, communication, and skill improvement. Evaluation creates commitment and accountability within a framework of monitoring. This global crowdsourcing open call generated numerous mentorship ideas, including LMIC-contextualized facilitation tools. The open call demonstrates a need for greater focus on mentorship. Our data may inform the development of formal and informal mentoring programs in LMIC settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimi Xiaoming Deng

In the last decade, there has been a discrepancy between the increasing recognition for research involvement in medical training and the stagnation in the number physician-scientists. Health research funding cutbacks, inadequate mentorship, heavy schedules, and unfamiliarity with scientific methodology are obstacles that limit research interest amongst junior medical learners and cause attrition of promising physician-scientist in training. This article outlines five strategies to promote and facilitate the development of physician-scientists with the understanding that research is integral to clinical excellence. Some of the ways the undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula can better lend themselves to producing clinicians with the skillset to address clinical uncertainties through an evidence-based approach are: partnerships between healthcare and academia, increasing admission to MD/PhD and Clinical Investigator programs, establishing fundamentals of scientific thinking, long-term research mentorship, facilitating knowledge translation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca KS Wong ◽  
Verna Vanderpuye ◽  
Joel Yarne ◽  
Ntokozo Ndlovu ◽  
Nwamaka Lasebikan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document