intergenerational risk sharing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

62
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Xiaobai Zhu ◽  
Mary Hardy ◽  
David Saunders

ABSTRACT Target benefit (TB) plans that incorporate intergenerational risk sharing have been demonstrated to be welfare improving over the long term. However, there has been little discussion of the short-term benefits for members in a defined benefit (DB) plan that is transitioning to TB. In this paper, we adopt a two-step approach that is designed to ensure the long-term sustainability of the new plan, without unduly sacrificing the benefit security of current retirees. We propose a cohort-based transition plan for reducing intergenerational inequity. Our study is based on simulations using an economic scenario generator with some theoretical results under simplified settings.





2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Staveley-O’Carroll ◽  
Olena M. Staveley-O’Carroll

AbstractWe employ a two-country overlapping-generations model to explore the international dimension of household portfolio choices induced by the asymmetric provision of government-run pensions. We study the resulting patterns of risk-sharing and the corresponding welfare effects on both home and foreign agents. Introducing the defined benefits pay-as-you-go system at home increases the welfare of all other agents at the expense of the home workers and improves the degree of intergenerational risk sharing abroad. Conversely, a defined contributions system leads to welfare losses of both home cohorts accompanied by gains abroad, but does increase the extent of intergenerational risk sharing at home.



2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobai Mike Zhu ◽  
Mary R. Hardy ◽  
David Saunders


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1785-1814
Author(s):  
Pim B. Kastelein ◽  
Ward E. Romp

When the financial positions of pension funds worsen, regulations prescribe that pension funds reduce the gap between their assets (invested contributions) and their liabilities (accumulated pension promises). This paper quantifies the business cycle effects and distributional implications of various types of restoration policies. We extend a canonical New-Keynesian model with a tractable demographic structure and, as a novelty, a flexible pension fund framework. Fund participants accumulate inflation-indexed or non-indexed benefits and funding adequacy is restored by revaluing previously accumulated pension wealth (Defined Contribution (DC)) or changing the pension fund contribution rate on labor income (Defined Benefit (DB)). Economies with DC pension funds respond similarly to adverse capital quality shocks as economies without pension funds. DB pension funds, however, distort labor supply decisions and exacerbate economic fluctuations. While DB pension funds achieve intergenerational risk-sharing, welfare analyses indicate that the negative effects of the induced distortions are sizeable.



2018 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 269-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark-Jan Boes ◽  
Arjen Siegmann




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document