moving fixation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

i-Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 204166952094321
Author(s):  
Sandra Utz ◽  
Claus-Christian Carbon

van Lier and Koning introduced the more-or-less morphing face illusion: The detection of changes in a constantly morphing face-sequence is strongly suppressed by fast eye saccades triggered by a moving fixation dot. Modulators of this intriguing effect were investigated with systematically varied facial stimuli (e.g., human faces from varying morphological groups, emotional states) and fixation location. Results replicated the overall pattern of moving fixations substantially reducing the sensitivity to detect transitions. Importantly, a deviation from real to perceived changes could only be detected when faces were altered in a way not happening in real world—by changing identity. When emotional states of faces were changed, people were capable of perceiving these changes: A situation very similar to everyday life where we might quickly inspect a face by executing fast eye saccades but where we are still aware of transient changes of the emotional state of the very same person.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Cavanagh ◽  
Peter U. Tse

AbstractIf a gabor pattern drifts in one direction while its internal texture drifts in the orthogonal direction, observers see a remarkable shift in its perceived direction when it is viewed in the periphery. The reported direction of the double-drift stimulus (also known as the infinite regress and curveball illusions) is some combination of the actual external motion of the gabor envelope and the internal motion of its texture (Tse & Hsieh, 2006). Here we find that if the observers track a fixation point that moves in tandem with the gabor, the illusion is undiminished. The pursuit of the moving fixation spot keeps the gabor roughly fixed at one location on the retina, cancelling its external motion, leaving only the internal motion. The gabor is seen to move in the world at roughly its actual speed as the motion of the eye is discounted at some point to recover velocities in world coordinates (e.g. Wallach, 1959). Our finding indicates that the combination of internal and external motion that produces the double drift illusion must happen after the eye movement signals have been factored into stimulus motions. We also test the double drift effect at various path lengths, durations, and speeds, with both mid-grey and black backgrounds, all with a static fixation. These results confirm that a simple vector combination of the two speeds alone accounts for virtually all the direction shifts on the grey background. On the black background, the illusion is eliminated. These results place constraints on where perceived spatial coordinates arise in the visual processing hierarchy to locations at or beyond where compensation for pursuit eye movements arise, specifically V3A, V6, MSTd, and VIP (e.g., Nau et al, 2018).





Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1519-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W Murray ◽  
Ian D Reid ◽  
Andrew J Davison

This paper demonstrates the use of active fixation on both fixed and moving fixation points to guide a robot vehicle by means of a steering rule which, at large distances, sets the steering angle directly proportional to the deviation of gaze direction from translation direction. Steering a motor vehicle around a winding but otherwise uncluttered road has been observed by Land and Lee to involve repeated periods of visual fixation upon the tangent point of the inside of each bend. We suggest that proportional rule devised for steering in the robotic example appears applicable to the observed human performance data, providing an alternative explanation to the quadratic rule proposed by Land and Lee.



1989 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Johnston ◽  
B. E. Damato ◽  
A. L. Evans ◽  
D. Allan


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document