Discovering Geometric Inequalities: The Concourse of GeoGebra Discovery, Dynamic Coloring and Maple Tools

Recently developed GeoGebra tools for the automated deduction and discovery of geometric statements combine in a unique way computational (real and complex) algebraic geometry algorithms and graphic features for the introduction and visualization of geometric statements. In our paper we will explore the capabilities and limitations of these new tools, through the case study of a classic geometric inequality, showing how to overcome, by means of a double approach, the difficulties that might arise attempting to ‘discover’ it automatically. On the one hand, through the introduction of the dynamic color scanning method, which allows to visualize on GeoGebra the set of real solutions of a given equation and to shed light on its geometry. On the other hand, via a symbolic computation approach which currently requires the (tricky) use of a variety of real geometry concepts (determining the real roots of a bivariate polynomial p(x,y) by reducing it to a univariate case through discriminants and Sturm sequences, etc.), which leads to a complete resolution of the initial problem. As the algorithmic basis for both instruments (scanning, real solving) are already internally available in GeoGebra (e.g., via the Tarski package), we conclude proposing the development and merging of such features in the future progress of GeoGebra automated reasoning tools.

Dealing with Degeneracies in Automated Theorem Proving in Geometry

We report, through different examples, the current development in GeoGebra, a widespread Dynamic Geometry software, of geometric automated reasoning tools by means of computational algebraic geometry algorithms. Then we introduce and analyze the case of the degeneracy conditions that so often arise in the automated deduction in geometry context, proposing two different ways for dealing with them. One is working with the saturation of the hypotheses ideal with respect to the ring of geometrically independent variables, as a way to globally handle the statement over all non-degenerate components. The second is considering the reformulation of the given hypotheses ideal—considering the independent variables as invertible parameters—and developing and exploiting the specific properties of this zero-dimensional case to analyze individually the truth of the statement over the different non-degenerate components.

Decidability of a Sound Set of Inference Rules for Computational Indistinguishability

Computational indistinguishability is a key property in cryptography and verification of security protocols. Current tools for proving it rely on cryptographic game transformations. We follow Bana and Comon’s approach [7, 8], axiomatizing what an adversary cannot distinguish. We prove the decidability of a set of first-order axioms that are computationally sound, though incomplete, for protocols with a bounded number of sessions whose security is based on an <small>IND-CCA 2 </small> encryption scheme. Alternatively, our result can be viewed as the decidability of a family of cryptographic game transformations. Our proof relies on term rewriting and automated deduction techniques.

Learning from Łukasiewicz and Meredith: Investigations into Proof Structures

The material presented in this paper contributes to establishing a basis deemed essential for substantial progress in Automated Deduction. It identifies and studies global features in selected problems and their proofs which offer the potential of guiding proof search in a more direct way. The studied problems are of the wide-spread form of “axiom(s) and rule(s) imply goal(s)”. The features include the well-known concept of lemmas. For their elaboration both human and automated proofs of selected theorems are taken into a close comparative consideration. The study at the same time accounts for a coherent and comprehensive formal reconstruction of historical work by Łukasiewicz, Meredith and others. First experiments resulting from the study indicate novel ways of lemma generation to supplement automated first-order provers of various families, strengthening in particular their ability to find short proofs.

Lifting propositional proof compression algorithms to first-order logic

Proofs are a key feature of modern propositional and first-order theorem provers. Proofs generated by such tools serve as explanations for unsatisfiability of statements. However, these explanations are complicated by proofs which are not necessarily as concise as possible. There are a wide variety of compression techniques for propositional resolution proofs but fewer compression techniques for first-order resolution proofs generated by automated theorem provers. This paper describes an approach to compressing first-order logic proofs based on lifting proof compression ideas used in propositional logic to first-order logic. The first approach lifted from propositional logic delays resolution with unit clauses, which are clauses that have a single literal. The second approach is partial regularization, which removes an inference $\eta $ when it is redundant in the sense that its pivot literal already occurs as the pivot of another inference in every path from $\eta $ to the root of the proof. This paper describes the generalization of the algorithms LowerUnits and RecyclePivotsWithIntersection (Fontaine et al.. Compression of propositional resolution proofs via partial regularization. In Automated Deduction—CADE-23—23rd International Conference on Automated Deduction, Wroclaw, Poland, July 31–August 5, 2011, p. 237--251. Springer, 2011) from propositional logic to first-order logic. The generalized algorithms compresses resolution proofs containing resolution and factoring inferences with unification. An empirical evaluation of these approaches is included.

Proof systems for Geometric theories (PROGEO)

We plan to study the problem of finding conservative extensions of first order logics. In this project we intend to establish a systematic procedure for adding geometric theories in both intuitionistic and classical logics, as well as to extend this procedure to bipolar axioms, a generalization of the set of geometric axioms. This way, we obtain proof systems for several mathematical theories, such as lattices, algebra and projective geometry, being able to reason about such theories using automated deduction.