Journal of Accounting Literature
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

76
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Published By Elsevier

0737-4607

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Jeny ◽  
Rucsandra Moldovan

PurposeThe knowledge- and Internet-based economy demands a reexamination of the accounting treatment for intangibles and a thorough understanding of the empirical evidence on this topic.Design/methodology/approachThe study reviews the literature on research and development (R&D), a specific internally developed intangible asset, using meta-analysis techniques that allow to highlight the areas of consensus and disagreement in quantitative empirical results. The literature the authors review addresses four main research questions on (1) the determinants of the decision to capitalize R&D, (2) stock market-based outcomes of capitalizing R&D, (3) firm-based outcomes related to expensing R&D and (4) stock market-based outcomes of expensing R&D.FindingsThe authors find higher value relevance of capitalized compared with expensed R&D. There is, however, little robust evidence on the determinants of the capitalization decision and the characteristics of capitalizers.Originality/valueThe authors conclude by highlighting future research that can allow accounting academics to contribute to standard setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Schnieder

PurposeThis paper provides an overview of the empirical findings on how relative performance information (RPI) affects employee behavior. Additionally, the review identifies future research opportunities based on a systematic analysis of the literature that incorporates findings across several disciplines and provides replicable, extensive coverage.Design/methodology/approachThis paper addresses a research gap via synthesis, drawing on the empirical literature identified and analyzed systematically. A conceptual framework is developed to integrate the studies.FindingsThe effect of RPI on performance through enhanced effort is positive; moreover, publicity and performance-dependent compensation strengthen the effect. However, RPI has also been found to increase sabotage among employees, and it can lead to less honest reporting. Future research could examine critical mediators and moderators of the RPI-performance relationship and thus complement the findings. Additionally, the effects of group-based RPI remain underrepresented. Future work could help to assess in greater detail how RPI interacts with culture and norms and whether RPI is due to personal expectations. There is also room for further research regarding the effects of RPI on cooperation, its consequences for learning, how it affects budgeting decisions and its implications for risk taking.Originality/valueThis paper presents the first literature review in the field of RPI. It provides synthesized knowledge about whether RPI is beneficial or detrimental to organizational performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Geng ◽  
Manos Kalargiros

PurposeThe effect of affect in accounting contexts has recently attracted interest, but numerous questions still remain. Given that affect can significantly impact a variety of accounting judgments and decisions in theoretically different manners, the purpose of this synthesis is to understand the state of extant accounting literature in affect and identify directions for future research.Design/methodology/approachThis synthesis systematically reviews experimental accounting papers related to affect in both theoretical and functional respects. The authors first elaborate on the affect infusion theory as the theoretical foundation for the synthesis. The authors then present the sampling method. In Section 4, the authors conceptually and factually summarize affect accounting papers in terms of four major functional areas: auditing, managerial/corporate accounting, tax and financial accounting. The implications of moderators examined in some papers are also discussed. Finally, the authors conclude by revisiting the importance of affect in accounting contexts.FindingsThroughout the synthesis, the authors provide future research opportunities with respect to theories, each functional area and other gaps in the accounting literature.Originality/valueThis synthesis contributes to the accounting literature by providing a pathway to understand the development of accounting research on affect, integrating theoretical foundations and offering future research opportunities to advance the literature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 70-86
Author(s):  
Lisa Hinson ◽  
Jennifer Wu Tucker ◽  
Diana Weng
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Zhan Gao ◽  
Weijia Li ◽  
John O’Hanlon
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 47-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip T. Lamoreaux ◽  
Lubomir P. Litov ◽  
Landon M. Mauler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document