藝術研究學報
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Published By Angle Publishing Co., Ltd.

2070-3589, 2070-3589

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (0) ◽  
pp. 001-023
Author(s):  
邱廷浩 邱廷浩

<p>本文旨在研究法國思想家尚˙布希亞(Jean Baudrillard)於《美學的幻象與去幻象》(Illusion, d&eacute;sillusion esth&eacute;tiques)書中的思考方式及其「幻象」的思維路徑。本文中的四個主要章節,分別聚焦在布希亞書中所演示的當代世界中各個不同範疇的概念對於「幻象」概念的流變與取代:藝術與電影的「去幻象」、影像的「擬像」、物的「廣告」以及藝術理論的「理念」。透過摘錄與分析,歸納出布希亞看似在利用藝術與「幻象」的關係來回應當代藝術創作的問題,實則是利用「幻象」的概念,串連起整個當代世界的流動與變化。</p> <p>&nbsp;</p><p>The purpose of this article is to study Jean Baudrillard&rsquo;s thought processes and his path of thought of &ldquo;illusion&rdquo; in the article Aesthetic Illusion and Disillusion. The article is composed of four main sections, focusing on the evolution and replacement of the concept &ldquo;illusion&rdquo; by illustrating different domains in the contemporary world demonstrated in Baudrillard&rsquo;s article: the &ldquo;disillusion&rdquo; of art and films, the &ldquo;simulation&rdquo; of images, the &ldquo;advertisement&rdquo; of objects and the &ldquo;ideas&rdquo; of art theories. Through excerpts and analysis, it comes to a conclusion that Baudrillard seems to be utilizing the relationship between art and &ldquo;illusion&rdquo; to respond to the problems of contemporary art, but in fact he uses the concept of &ldquo;illusion&rdquo; to connect the flow and changes of the entire contemporary world.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (0) ◽  
pp. 049-065
Author(s):  
吳姍蒲 吳姍蒲

<p>本文旨在揭開菲利普斯的跨文化藝術史學視野。菲利普斯〈美學原始主義的再訪&mdash;&mdash;全球散佈的「原始藝術」與土著現代主義的興起〉一文,極為特殊地以「案例」構成論述主幹。然而,菲利普斯並不透過案例研究重施二十世紀後期探討西方藝術現代主義霸權的激烈批評,而是展現了觸及人類學範疇的、具地方脈絡的跨文化特性。這種以「案例」為核心的書寫方式,無論在藝術史學方法的範疇上或是在曾引發激烈論爭的「現代藝術中的原始主義」議題上,都展現了相當的特殊性。是以,本研究針對菲利普斯的「案例」操作方式分析其思考脈絡,發現「案例」不僅體現了菲利普斯對西方美術中現代主義侷限性的反省,更勾勒了一種具有在地特質的跨文化新藝術史學設想。</p> <p>&nbsp;</p><p>This essay intends to reveal the vision of cross-cultural in art history of Ruth B. Phillips. The essay of R. B. Phillips &ldquo;Aesthetic primitivism revisited: The global diaspora of &lsquo;primitive art&rsquo; and the rise of Indigenous modernisms&rdquo; has the characteristic of using &quot;cases study&quot; to constitute the backbone of the discussion. However, Phillips does not represent the fierce criticism of the hegemony of Western art modernism in the late twentieth century through the &ldquo;case study&rdquo;, but instead demonstrates the cross-cultural characteristics that touch the anthropological category and local context. This extraordinary way of writing with &quot;case study&quot; as the core, showing considerable particularity both in the field of art history methods and in the issue of &quot;primitivism in modern art&quot; which has sparked fierce controversy. This research aims at the operation method of Phillips&rsquo;s &quot;case study&quot; to analyzes the thinking context, finding that the &quot; case study &quot; not only reflects Phillips’ reflection on the limitations of modernism in Western art, but also outlines a new cross-cultural assumption in the history of art with local characteristics.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (0) ◽  
pp. 024-048
Author(s):  
趙悅如 趙悅如

<p>本文旨在研究堀浩哉與其主導的「美術家共鬥會議」(簡稱「美共鬥」),如何在前衛終結和學運的動盪環境中,扮演他作為美術家的角色。研究重點分為三部分。第一,點出前衛終結的危機,透過回溯美共鬥的形成背景,指出堀浩哉的藝術動機;第二,探討堀浩哉如何形成他的美共鬥經驗,並在多元藝術類型的嘗試中思考創作的可能性,聚焦在堀浩哉1980年前進行的初期藝術實踐;第三,以堀浩哉1980年後的繪畫和行為藝術(performance)發展為重心,延伸並呼應了美共鬥的思想。研究的發現,在於堀浩哉以美共鬥思想對藝術實踐的探索和演進,他的行為藝術也不僅是繪畫邊緣的試探,兩者是獨立且共生的關係。</p> <p>&nbsp;</p><p>The purpose of the study was to identify HORI Kosai and the student organization, &ldquo;Bijutsuka Kyoto Kaigi&rdquo; (in short, Bikyoto, which means Artists Co-Struggle Council in English), which he initiated; this study also evaluates the important role he played as an artist at the end of avant-garde, and during the instability of the late 60&rsquo;s student movement. There are three main points to this study. Firstly, to point out the crisis at the end of avant-garde, and through reviewing Bikyoto, we identified HORI&rsquo;s artistic motive. Secondly, to discuss HORI&rsquo;s earlier exploration in multiple genres, as well as his experience in Bikyoto, and bring a focus to what shaped his art practice prior to 1980. Thirdly, I&rsquo;d like to emphasize how HORI&rsquo;s paintings and performances after 1980 extend the thoughts and ideas of Bikyoto. In conclusion, this study is to examine how HORI used the Bikyoto ideas to explore and progress his art practice, as well as how his performances weren&rsquo;t merely an extension of his paintings&rsquo; boundary, both of which are independent entities, but mutually influenced each other.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document