Settlement Of Civil Disputes Regarding Incompatibility Of Objects Of Online Purchase

The thing to remember is that buying and selling online is on the principle is the same as the factual sale and purchase on generally. Consumer protection law related to sale transactions even buying online as we previously explained is no different with the applicable law in real buying and selling transactions. The difference is only in the use of internet facilities or means other telecommunications. The result is in buying and selling transactions online it is difficult to do execution or real action if there is a dispute or a criminal act of fraud. Deep cyber nature transactions electronically allows everyone either the seller not the buyer disguises or falsifies the identity inside every transaction or sale and purchase agreement. In the event that the business actor or seller is using an identity fake or gimmick in buying and selling online, then business actors can also be convicted based on Article 378 of the Book The Criminal Code (“KUHP”) on fraud and Article 28 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law on spreading fake news and misleading which results in consumer losses in Electronic Transactions.

Prespective and Implementative of The Basis of The Single Prosecution System of The Prosecution of The Prosecution Bill

Revision of Law no. 16 of 2004 concerning the Republic of Indonesia Attorney General's Office is a necessity because of the many changes that have occurred in the field. would replace Law no. 16 of 2004 is the right moment to encourage the Ago to do better. "Change is a necessity. Likewise in legislation, " ini this research concern about the duties and powers of the Prosecutor's Office in the draft law on the prosecutor's office. namely Guidelines on The Role of Prosecutors which serve as guidelines and inspire in the amendment of this Law, especially matters relating to independence in Prosecution, Accountability in Case Handling, Standards of Professionalism, and Protection for Prosecutors. If the Prosecution Bill becomes the new Prosecutor's Law, justice seekers will place the foundation of justice on the prosecutor, so that the prosecution process starting from investigation, investigation, prosecution and execution will optimally realize substantial truth and justice.

Legal Review Enforcement Repressive Legal Efforts Against Narcotics Users Of Children

In terms of enforcement the law. Second, legal instruments in the framework of criminal law enforcement abuse of narcotics against minors using a legal basis Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. In the the provisions of the SPPA Law, in order to prosecute children who are involved with the law, then a diversion effort is carried out, namely a restorative effort or recovery state solve the problem together, in this research is focous about How are repressive legal measures against child narcotics users in under age?. As previously explained, in act Number 11 In 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, there is a restorative principle (Restorative justice), which is aimed at restoring the original state, meaning efforts to restore the attitudes and mentality of children who have committed acts the crime of narcotics abuse to be as before or as a cure for the criminal act he has committed. Of course, the provisions of the Narcotics Law are not sidelined even though his repressive legal remedies are based on the provisions of law SPPA.

Jurisdiction Analysis of The Distribution of Integrity Children Out of Marriage as Substitute Heritages (Study of The Supreme Court Decision Number: 784 K/Pdt/2014)

Many problems regarding inheritance law occur due to distribution that is not in accordance with applicable regulations. In the Supreme Court Decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014, the main research problems are: (1) How is the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs based on the Civil Code study of the Supreme Court's decision number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 . (2) Is the content of the Supreme Court's order Number: 784/Pdt/2014 concerning the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs appropriate or not according to the Civil Code. This type of research is normative juridical. The data used are secondary data, library study data collection and qualitative data analysis and deductive method conclusions. The conclusion of this decision study states that (1) the heirs to the inheritance of the Supreme Court decision study number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 are Dewina Tjandra, Trisnani Tjandra, Patty Tjandra, Sarina Tjandra, Arifin Tjandra, Ony Tjandra, and Fitri Tjandra . (2) The Supreme Court's decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014 regarding the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as substitute heirs is not in accordance with Article 842 of the Civil Code.