Peripheral Nerve Entrapment Impairments Revisited: Part I

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
J. Mark Melhorn ◽  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Charles N. Brooks

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, introduced the concept of diagnosis-based impairments (DBI), and a modified version of this method can be used in rating peripheral nerve injury in general (Section 5.4) and upper limb entrapment syndromes (Section 15.4f). The first portion of this article reviews the evaluation of upper extremity nerve impairment and summarizes inclusion criteria and causation correlation for carpal tunnel syndrome, Guyon's canal syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, anterior interosseous, Wartenberg's syndrome, and radial tunnel syndrome. Very mild nerve entrapments do exist and may fail to meet the AMA Guides criteria for impairment related to a diagnosis of nerve entrapment. Electrodiagnostic examination includes nerve conduction studies that assess the largest, most heavily myelinated axons, and needle electromyelography, which detects muscle membrane instability but not the sensory function of nerves. A case example from the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, shows the process of permanent impairment rating in a case of carpal tunnel syndrome. Determination of impairment for peripheral nerve entrapments can be easily accomplished once one understands how to determine if the nerve under consideration from the electrodiagnostic evaluation demonstrates a conduction delay, a conduction block, or an axon loss. This establishes the test findings that usually are the only objective findings present.

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
R. LUCHETTI ◽  
A. MINGIONE ◽  
M. MONTELEONE ◽  
G. CRISTIANI

The authors describe a case of carpal tunnel syndrome due to Madelung’s deformity. They discuss the pathophysiological causes of median nerve entrapment to explain the compression which occurs in this disease and its clinical implications. They take also into consideration the surgical approach to the carpal tunnel in this particular condition.


2014 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 642-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefferson Becker ◽  
Renata Siciliani Scalco ◽  
Franciane Pietroski ◽  
Luiz Felippe S. Celli ◽  
Irenio Gomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Bruno Elmgreen

ABSTRACT Median nerve entrapment is a frequent disorder encountered by all clinicians at some point of their career. Affecting the distal median nerve, entrapment occurs most frequently at the level of the wrist resulting in a carpal tunnel syndrome. Median nerve entrapment may also occur proximally giving rise to the much less frequent pronator teres syndrome and even less frequent anterior interosseous nerve syndrome, which owing to the paucity of cases may prove challenging to diagnose. An unusual case of anterior interosseous syndrome precipitated by extraordinary exertion in a tetraplegic endurance athlete is presented with ancillary dynamometric, electrodiagnostic, ultrasonographic, and biochemical findings.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumi Maeda ◽  
Norman Kettner ◽  
Jeungchan Lee ◽  
Jieun Kim ◽  
Stephen Cina ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 599-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. PADUA ◽  
M. LO MONACO ◽  
R. PADUA ◽  
F. TAMBURRELLI ◽  
B. GREGORI ◽  
...  

Fifty-three hands with carpal tunnel syndrome had pre- and postoperative evaluations of median nerve distal motor latency (from wrist to thenar muscles) and orthodromic sensory nerve conduction velocity (from thumb and middle finger to wrist). At 6 months we observed a neurophysiological return to normal in all cases with normal preoperative distal motor latency and in about 50% of the hands with preoperative distal motor latency between 4 and 6 ms. Prolongation of the distal motor latency over 6 ms was not followed by return to neurophysiological normality, although some degree of sensory function was restored in the majority of cases.


Hand Surgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Pajardi ◽  
Loris Pegoli ◽  
Giorgio Pivato ◽  
Paolo Zerbinati

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is still today the most common nerve entrapment syndrome at the level of the upper extremity. When surgery is indicated, the surgical treatment of choice is the opening of the retinaculum. The authors describe their experience on 12,702 carpal tunnel decompressions, by the endoscopic procedure in a period of 14 years, outlining the indications, post-operative treatment, complications and results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Segura León JM ◽  
Medina i Mirapeix F. ◽  
Valera Garrido F.

Abstract Background Percutaneous needle electrolysis is a physical therapy technique which has shown to be useful for the treatment of nerve entrapments. The aim of the present study was to analyze the possible adverse effects and the follow-up pattern after the application of percutaneous needle electrolysis in carpal tunnel syndrome. Material and Methods A descriptive observational study conducted at the Traumatology Service of the Ciudad Real Hospital, in patients with a medical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electromyography (gold standard).Percutaneous needle electrolysis was applied under ultrasound guidance in the superficial and deep interphase of the median nerve in its passage through the carpal tunnel, applied with a frequency of once every seven days over four weeks.The week after each intervention, the follow-up pattern of the adverse effects variables was gathered, grouped in the following categories: type of adverse effect, moment of appearance, prevalence period, impact and causality.At 1.5 weeks and 6 weeks after the last intervention, the following variables were gathered: presence of painful or hypertrophic scar, stiffness at the level of the wrist, hand or fingers, infection of the wound, alteration of reflex sympathetic trophism, symptoms related with a nerve lesion, symptoms related with a tendon lesion, post intervention effusion. The McNemar test was used for comparative measures between the first, second, third and fourth intervention, without significant variations (p < 0.05). Results 30 cases participated in the study, of which one subject had to abandon the treatment after the first application because of apprehension in relation to following through with treatment.Of the 117 intervention applied, one vegetative reaction was recorded, which was transitory and without consequences. Pain appeared during the intervention in 96.5% of the interventions, after the intervention pain was present in 56%, whereas pain experienced days after the intervention occurred in 28.4%. No cases required further medical intervention, and there were no irreversible cases, independent of the cause. For the remaining variables, the records were negative in all interventions.No adverse effects were described for any cases at the follow up at 1.5 and 6 weeks post-intervention. Conclusions No adverse effects were described at the end of the intervention in the short to mid term. Regarding the follow-up pattern, the pain followed a highly homogeneous course, there were no irreversible adverse effects requiring intervention, and no relationship was found with any cause on behalf of the patient.


2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 219-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Gozke ◽  
N Dortcan ◽  
A Kocer ◽  
M Cetinkaya ◽  
G Akyuz ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Bak ◽  
S. Bak ◽  
P. Gaster ◽  
F. Mathiesen ◽  
K. Ellemann ◽  
...  

Purpose: to determine whether specific parameters measured on MR images correlated to electrophysiological changes in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) Material and Methods: Prospective clinical examinations were made of 20 patients with suspected CTS. We performed bilateral electrophysiological examinations of the median nerve and bilateral MR imaging of the wrists Results: the electrophysiological examination suggested median nerve entrapment in 18 wrists. These wrists were compared to the remaining 22 electrophysiologically normal wrists. in addition, we compared both wrists in 12 patients with unilateral symptoms of CTS without reference to the electrophysiological findings. We found no difference in specific MR parameters between the 2 groups Conclusion: Neither symptoms nor electrophysiological findings in CTS were related to specific MR parameters


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document