Impairment Assessment of Female Sexual Dysfunction

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Randolph Soo Hoo

Abstract Impairment assessment of female sexual dysfunction using the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth or Sixth Edition, must be performed using appropriate evaluation and objective findings to support ratable sexual dysfunction. In both editions, sexual dysfunction is discussed in Chapter 7, The Urinary and Reproductive Systems, and Chapter 13, The Central and Peripheral Nervous System. In the fifth edition, the maximum impairment rating for female sexual functioning is 35% whole person impairment; in the sixth edition, the maximum is 20%. In terms of rating female reproductive organ impairment, the fifth edition gives consideration to the differences between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Table 7-9, Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Vulval and Vaginal Disease in the fifth edition is used to rate female sexual dysfunction; three classes are identified, and, although age is not a specific consideration, this edition discusses differences between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. In the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, Table 7-10, Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Vulval and Vaginal Disease, is used and provides four classes, two of which have severity grades. Each class addresses historical signs and symptoms of vulvar or vaginal diseases, vulval and vaginal physical alterations, and potential effect of altered vaginal anatomy for vaginal delivery (if premenopausal). Neurogenic sexual dysfunction is combined with other related impairments using the Combined Values Chart.

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wulf H. Utian ◽  
David B. Maclean ◽  
Tara Symonds ◽  
James Symons ◽  
Veena Somayaji ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
R. Balon

The first challenge in diagnosing female sexual dysfunction(s) originates in our diagnostic system. The traditional model of classifying sexual dysfunction is anchored in the sexual response cycle: desire - arousal - orgasm - resolution. However, as some experts have pointed out, this classification may be problematic in the area of female sexuality. Both the diagnoses of female hypoactive sexual desire disorder (FHSDD) and female arousal disorder (FSAD) probably need to be redefined and refined. Examples include adding the lack of responsive desire to the FHSDD criteria and creating categories of subjective FSAD and genital FSAD.The second challenge in diagnosis female dysfunction is the lack of solid diagnostic instruments, diagnosis-specific laboratory assays and other specific testing. Specific measures of female sexual functioning, such as Female Sexual Functioning Index, Profile of Female Sexual Functioning, Sexual Function Questionnaire, Sexual Desire and Interest Inventory, and Female Sexual Distress Scale were mostly developed as outcome measures. No solid diagnostic instrument for sexual dysfunction exists, not even a version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM sexual dysfunctions. The contribution of imaging techniques, such as ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging or thermography, to the diagnosis is unclear, and these techniques are far (if ever) from clinical use.Thus, a detailed comprehensive clinical interview combined with physical examination, possibly a gynecological examination, and in some cases laboratory hormonal testing remains the cornerstone of diagnosing and assessing female sexual dysfunctions.


Climacteric ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Nijland ◽  
J. Nathorst-Böös ◽  
S. Palacios ◽  
P. W. van de Weijer ◽  
S. Davis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gustavo Maximiliano Dutra da Silva ◽  
Sônia Maria Rolim Rosa Lima ◽  
Benedito Fabiano dos Reis ◽  
Carolina Furtado Macruz ◽  
Sóstenes Postigo

Abstract Objective The incidence of obesity, which is a chronic condition, has increased in recent years. The association between obesity and female sexual dysfunction remains unclear, particularly in postmenopausal women. In the present study, we evaluated whether obesity is a risk factor for sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Methods This is a cross-sectional study that analyzed data from interviews of postmenopausal women at the Climacteric Outpatient Clinic from 2015 to 2018. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 221 women aged between 40 and 65 years old were selected and invited to participate in the study. Obesity was diagnosed according to body mass index (BMI). The participants were grouped into the following BMI categories: group 1, 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 (normal); group 2, 25.0–29.9 kg/m2 (overweight); and group 3, ≥30.0 kg/m2 (obese). Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. Cutoff points of ≥23 and ≥26.5 were adopted to define a diagnosis of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision by the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-IV-TR). Results The desire and arousal scores were statistically higher in the normal BMI group than in the obese group (p = 0.028 and p = 0.043, respectively). The satisfaction scores were statistically higher in the normal BMI group than in the overweight and obese groups (p < 0.05). The total FSFI score statistically differed among the BMI categories (p = 0.027). Conclusion In the present study, obese and overweight postmenopausal women had higher total scores than women with normal BMI. Our results show that obese and overweight postmenopausal women had a higher index of dysfunction in desire and arousal and lower sexual satisfaction than normal-weight women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document