Foot ulceration and vertebral osteomyelitis with Corynebacterium haemolyticum

1977 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 646-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. I. Ceilley
1997 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
João Maurício Scarpellini Campos ◽  
Liege Maria Abreu de Carvalho ◽  
Marcos Vinicius Silva Pone ◽  
Eloá N. Santos ◽  
Paulo Nóbrega Barbosa da Fonseca

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. E1219-E1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Nakase ◽  
Ryosuke Matsuda ◽  
Ryo Tamaki ◽  
Rinsei Tei ◽  
Young-Su Park ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyu Zhou ◽  
Kiyon Naser-Tavakolian ◽  
Michael Clifton ◽  
Isael Perez ◽  
Valmore Suprenant

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002150
Author(s):  
Francesca M Chappell ◽  
Fay Crawford ◽  
Margaret Horne ◽  
Graham P Leese ◽  
Angela Martin ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for foot ulceration in people with diabetes.Research design and methodsDevelopment of a CPR using individual participant data from four international cohort studies identified by systematic review, with validation in a fifth study. Development cohorts were from primary and secondary care foot clinics in Europe and the USA (n=8255, adults over 18 years old, with diabetes, ulcer free at recruitment). Using data from monofilament testing, presence/absence of pulses, and participant history of previous ulcer and/or amputation, we developed a simple CPR to predict who will develop a foot ulcer within 2 years of initial assessment and validated it in a fifth study (n=3324). The CPR’s performance was assessed with C-statistics, calibration slopes, calibration-in-the-large, and a net benefit analysis.ResultsCPR scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 had a risk of ulcer within 2 years of 2.4% (95% CI 1.5% to 3.9%), 6.0% (95% CI 3.5% to 9.5%), 14.0% (95% CI 8.5% to 21.3%), 29.2% (95% CI 19.2% to 41.0%), and 51.1% (95% CI 37.9% to 64.1%), respectively. In the validation dataset, calibration-in-the-large was −0.374 (95% CI −0.561 to −0.187) and calibration slope 1.139 (95% CI 0.994 to 1.283). The C-statistic was 0.829 (95% CI 0.790 to 0.868). The net benefit analysis suggested that people with a CPR score of 1 or more (risk of ulceration 6.0% or more) should be referred for treatment.ConclusionThe clinical prediction rule is simple, using routinely obtained data, and could help prevent foot ulcers by redirecting care to patients with scores of 1 or above. It has been validated in a community setting, and requires further validation in secondary care settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2808
Author(s):  
Ranita Siru ◽  
Melanie S. Burkhardt ◽  
Wendy A. Davis ◽  
Jonathan Hiew ◽  
Laurens Manning ◽  
...  

Aims: To determine whether there is an excess of cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes and foot ulceration. Methods: 55 patients with type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers attending Multidisciplinary Diabetes Foot Ulcer clinics (MDFU cohort) were compared with 56 patients with type 2 diabetes attending Complex Diabetes clinics (CDC cohort) using commonly used screening tests for cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)), as well as foot self-care, mood and health literacy. MMSE was also compared between the MDFU cohort and a historical community-based cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes (FDS2 cohort). Results: Median MMSE scores were the same in all three groups (28/30). Median MOCA scores did not differ between the MDFU and CDC cohorts (25/30). There were no significant differences in the percentages of patients with MMSE ≤ 24 or MOCA ≤ 25 between MDFU and CDC cohorts (3.6% versus 10.7%, p = 0.27 and 56.4% versus 51.8%, p = 0.71, respectively), findings that did not change after adjustment for age, sex, education, diabetes duration, and random blood glucose. Conclusions: Using conventionally applied instruments, patients with type 2 diabetes and foot ulceration have similar cognition compared with patients without, from either hospital-based clinic or community settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document