Single Agent Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Cancers: The Murine Subrenal Capsule Assay

1983 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 715-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. McCormick ◽  
W. R. Panje ◽  
S. Seltzer ◽  
R. H. Merrick
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. PCRT.S6107 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.P.S. Banipal ◽  
M.K. Mahajan

Aims Response of single agent chemotherapy in improving quality of life in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. Methods and material This is a study of the 18 patients with advanced cancers of head and neck, who had failed earlier attempts of radical treatment with Surgery, Radiotherapy ± chemotherapy and have residual or recurrent tumours, were treated with single agent Injection Methotrexate 50 mg/m2 weekly. Follow up visit complaints and clinical examination details were recorded. History regarding pain, speech and diet was collected for every visit. Severity of pain was divided with the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 pain scales. Symptom control was done with analgesics, antiemetic and infection control. Results Weekly single agent chemotherapy with injection Methotrexate has significantly improved the quality of life of patients. 38.8% of patients have shown good response with decrease in the tumour bulk by more than 50% and other 39% of patients have stable disease on Injection Methotrexate. 22.2% patients have shown disease progression on single agent chemotherapy. Overall 83.3% patients have shown improvement in Quality of life in terms of symptomatic control. After 6 weekly treatments with injection methotrexate 63% patients were pain free with 16% patients reported decrease in pain. 87.5% of patients have shown improvement in speech and diet. Improvement in symptoms has shown decrease in depression in cancer patients. Grade 3 toxicity observed was Neutropenia (11.1%), anaemia (11.1%) and Mucositis (16.6%) which was managed adequately. Median survival with good quality of life is 5.4 months. Conclusions Single agent methotrexate chemotherapy on an out-patient basis can provide good quality of life. Decrease in pain along with improvement in speech and diet has shown decrease in incidence of depression and overall positive impact on psychosocial status. Few cases have shown sustained regression of gross disease adding to maintained quality of life with better socio-economic compliance.


1992 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-138
Author(s):  
Hiroshi MUNAKATA ◽  
Yoshiaki KAYADA ◽  
Masateru KAWAHARA ◽  
Rouzou ARIMORI ◽  
Tomoji SAKAMOTO ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-181
Author(s):  
Charles M. Stiernberg ◽  
William H. Rotzler ◽  
Klara Valyi-Nagy ◽  
James A. Hokanson ◽  
Price E. Hale

The murine subrenal capsule assay is an in vivo method for determining the responsiveness of solid tumor xenografts to chemotherapeutic agents. It was used in this study for the purposes of (1) constructing growth curves of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and (2) collecting pilot data on the effects that indomethacin and cisplatin have on this malignant condition. Nine of the ten assays performed were evaluable. Indomethacin, cisplatin, or both were used as treatment drugs in each assay. One-millimeter fragments of viable tumor, from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, were implanted beneath the renal capsules of normal immunocompetent mice. Baseline and posttreatment measurements were made of the xenografts, and response to treatment was determined by comparing changes in tumor sizes of the test and control groups. Results indicated that reduction in tumor sizes occurred in indomethacin-treated mice in four assays and in cisplatin-treated mice in six assays. In addition, two separate growth curves were calculated by plotting the mean change in tumor size in five mice per day on days 3 through 7. In conclusion, the subrenal capsule assay is a relatively rapid and inexpensive assay in which squamous cell carcinoma remains viable and therapeutic agents can be tested. However, clinical trials that use this assay to choose treatment drugs are needed in order to correlate assay results with clinical responses.


Author(s):  
Satyajit Pradhan ◽  
A. K. Asthana ◽  
R. K. Jain ◽  
G. C. Pant ◽  
K. Sahni

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
N.S. Grachev ◽  
◽  
I.N. Vorozhtsov ◽  
N.V. Babaskina ◽  
E.Yu. Iaremenko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document