scholarly journals Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in 11 Screening Programs in the United States

JAMA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 312 (7) ◽  
pp. 729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Kwan ◽  
Roshini S. Abraham ◽  
Robert Currier ◽  
Amy Brower ◽  
Karen Andruszewski ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 405-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Dvorak ◽  
Elie Haddad ◽  
Rebecca H. Buckley ◽  
Morton J. Cowan ◽  
Brent Logan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (23) ◽  
pp. 948-956
Author(s):  
Melinda Erdős

Abstract: Severe combined immunodeficiency is the first immune deficiency disorder which was included in the newborn screening program in the United States in 2010. In Hungary, newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiencies is crucial because of the routine BCG vaccination, as in the case of an affected newborn with negative family history, the vaccine may lead to fatal BCG-itis. This paper analyzes the possibilities of introducing newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiencies and summarizes current experiences and results. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(23): 948–956.


Screening ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecelia Walraven ◽  
John E. Sorrentino ◽  
Harvey L. Levy ◽  
George F. Grady

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Pirozzi

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease (SCID) is life-threatening disease of infancy and childhood characterized by recurrent infections and failure to thrive. Given the modern medical progress made available for treating SCID, early identification of these children is paramount to their wellbeing and overall survival into adulthood. Newborn screening (NBS) programs provide the opportunity to identify SCID patients before life-threatening infections can manifest. The T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) assay currently used for SCID screening has been shown to satisfy all parameters of an effective screening test.  Its widespread use is indicated by the time-sensitive nature of the disease, its efficacy in reducing morbidity and mortality in these patients, and the cost-effectiveness of prompt recognition versus long-term management. While immensely beneficial, screening tests still hold limitations that require analyzing. Follow-up measures for SCID identification programs have identified ambiguity and inconsistency among testing algorithms across facilities and technical errors that have causes inaccurate results. Considering fewer than 20% of SCID patients report a positive family history and the lethal consequences of disease if left untreated, a screening program is a highly valuable tool for early diagnosis and prompt intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document