Lifetime benefits and costs of intensive therapy as practiced in the diabetes control and complications trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group

JAMA ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 276 (17) ◽  
pp. 1409-1415 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Purnell

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) was a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial that began in the 1980s and was carried out over a decade to determine whether intensive treatment aimed at maintaining blood glucose concentrations close to the normal range could decrease the frequency and severity of microvascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes. The results showed that intensive therapy effectively delays the onset and progression of diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes.1The side effects associated with intensive therapy were a nearly three-fold increased frequency of severe hypoglycaemia and greater weight gain. For the majority of patients with type 1 diabetes, the benefits of intensive therapy were considered to vastly outweigh these risks. However, the potential detrimental effects of weight gain, especially on macrovascular risks, are being revisited.


1993 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 768-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen J Anderson ◽  
Linda Delahanty ◽  
Maryanne Richardson ◽  
Gay Castle ◽  
Susan Cercone ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 683-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Benjamin ◽  
D B Sacks

Abstract On the basis of the results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), the American Diabetes Association (ADA) now recommends tight control of blood glucose to near-normal concentrations as the primary goal for most eligible insulin-dependent diabetic patients. In the DCCT, intensive therapeutic intervention was based on frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose and monthly measurements of glycohemoglobin. The importance of glycohemoglobin assessments serves to highlight the present inadequacies in laboratory measurements of this analyte, which hinders wide implementation of the ADA recommendations. Clinical interventions aimed at achieving the DCCT's published therapeutic goals may place patients at a significantly increased risk for life-threatening hypoglycemia, if the therapy is based on nonstandardized laboratory results. Clinical laboratories will now be under increasing pressure to provide reproducible, standardized measurements of glycohemoglobin, a goal that recent research has shown to be realistic, if widespread interlaboratory calibration is adopted. Finally, recent advances in measuring glycated serum proteins appear to warrant reevaluation of such assays during future intensive therapy trials, as potentially important tools for fine-tuning tight blood glucose control.


2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Blum

Diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood. It is listed as a disabling condition under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and therefore accommodations must be made for these children in school. School nurses are responsible for large numbers of children, usually in more than one setting. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial examined intensive therapy and its effects on the long-term morbidity and quality of life of diabetic adolescents. A number of recommendations were made that apply to school nurses. The purpose of this article is to determine if any studies have been conducted to explore whether school nurses are using the results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial to write individualized healthcare plans defining the care of students with diabetes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document