Time to Benefit of Bisphosphonate Therapy for the Prevention of Fractures Among Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Author(s):  
William James Deardorff ◽  
Irena Cenzer ◽  
Brian Nguyen ◽  
Sei J. Lee
2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira B. Harris ◽  
Kimberly L. Nealy ◽  
Delilah J. Jackson ◽  
Phillip L. Thornton

Osteoporosis is a leading cause of debility and declining quality of life in postmenopausal women worldwide. Treatment of osteoporosis has been ubiquitous throughout the developed world since the mid-1990s, most notably with the introduction of bisphosphonates in 1995. Nonetheless, the incidence of hip fractures increased by 25% between 1990 and 2000, despite advances in osteoporosis therapy. Studies indicate that bone density increases over the first 3 years of bisphosphonate therapy and then plateaus or perhaps even declines, placing these patients at greater risk of fracture. Since hip fractures are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and increased cost of health care, improvements in treating osteoporosis are critical. Denosumab is a novel monoclonal antibody targeted against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) that inhibits osteoclast activity. Initial data suggest that denosumab increases bone mineral density for greater than 3 years. Of greater importance, denosumab has been shown to decrease vertebral fractures by 68%, nonvertebral fractures by 19%, and hip fractures by 42% for at least 36 months. Data also indicate that the safety profile of denosumab is equivalent to other drugs used in osteoporosis management, but potential risks of immunosuppression and cancer have been hypothesized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12532-e12532
Author(s):  
Veera Durga Sravanthi Panuganty ◽  
Suganija Lakkunarajah ◽  
Sumugan Shanmuganathan ◽  
Morgan Black ◽  
Sharifa Nasreen ◽  
...  

e12532 Background: Early Breast Cancer Trialist Collaborative Group meta-analysis suggested significant reduction in bone metastasis and breast cancer mortality among post-menopausal women diagnosed with early breast cancer when treated with an adjuvant bisphosphonate. Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline published in 2017, recommends the use of an adjuvant bisphosphonate in postmenopausal women who are candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Our goal was to evaluate trends and factors associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate usage since the guideline’s publication. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of postmenopausal women treated for early breast at the London Regional Cancer Program from 2017-2018. Univariate and a multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate factors potentially associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate use including age, stage, grade, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 receptor status and previous use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The percentage of patients offered, receiving and declining therapy was also recorded and the time interval from surgery to start of bisphosphonate therapy (< 6 months, 6-12 months or >12 months). Results: We identified 286 postmenopausal breast cancer patients, of whom 75 (28%) received adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy. In our multivariable model, cancer stage [odds ratio (OR) stage II vs. I=2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-4.74) and OR Stage III vs. I=4.94, 95% CI 1.84-13.17] and previous use of adjuvant chemotherapy (OR=2.76, 95%CI 1.37-5.55) were significantly associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate use. Among 133 patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, 51% were offered adjuvant bisphosphonate and of these 81% patients accepted therapy. Among a total of 75 patients receiving adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy 19% initiated therapy within 6 months of surgery, 48% within 6-12 months of surgery, and 33% after 12 months following surgery. Conclusions: Stage and previous use of chemotherapy were significantly associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy. Our study observes the potential underutilization of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy and possible need to start treatment earlier in some patients. Further education and awareness of the clinical practice guidelines regarding adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy may be warranted and additional population-based study investigating treatment patterns and real-world effectiveness.


Bone ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1006-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Greenspan ◽  
Subashan Perera ◽  
Robert Recker ◽  
Julie M. Wagner ◽  
Parmatma Greeley ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Leena Palomo ◽  
Maria Clarinda A. Buencamino-Francisco ◽  
John J. Carey ◽  
Mala Sivanandy ◽  
Holly Thacker

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1259-1263
Author(s):  
Rodica Narcisa Tanasescu ◽  
Razvan Bardan ◽  
Adriana Ledeti ◽  
Ionut Ledeti ◽  
Petru Matusz ◽  
...  

A longitudinal, randomized, five year follow-up clinical and experimental study was conducted during May 1, 2011 - June 30, 2016. A number of 125 eligible postmenopausal women (BMD T-score spine (-2.8 � 0.5)); BMD at the femoral hip (-2.6 � 0.8), treated only with biphosphonates, were enrolled in the study. The patient�s age ranged between 60 and 65 years. All the women were stone formers, with more than five episodes of crystalluria in the last five years. Exclusion criteria: kidney chronic diseases, use of drugs known to affect bone metabolism and renal function, patients with multi-morbidities. The aim of our study was to assess the connection between postmenopausal osteoporosis and the risk of worsening calcium balance in urolithiasis, based on the complex thermogravimetric findings and porosity studies of renal stones eliminated by these patients. The study of renal-urinary concretions offers the possibility to amplify the specific effects of the thermal decomposition processes of substances, reflecting the sample�s global composition. The research of calculi porosity gives information about the dissolution possibilities of the renal-urinary concretions. In conclusion, in postmenopausal women, proper administration of bisphosphonate therapy must accompany the supplementary medication with calcium and vitamin D, always correlated to the metabolic status of the osteoporotic patient.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olja Grgić ◽  
Branka Kovačev-Zavišić ◽  
Tanja Veljović ◽  
Jovanka Novaković-Paro ◽  
Tatjana Maravić ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 1468-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouta Ito ◽  
Victoria S. Blinder ◽  
Elena B. Elkin

Purpose Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) increase the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures in postmenopausal women who receive adjuvant AIs for hormone receptor (HR) –positive early breast cancer (EBC). We compared the cost effectiveness of alternative screening and treatment strategies for fracture prevention. Methods We developed a Markov state transition model to simulate clinical practice and outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of women age 60 years with HR-positive EBC starting a 5-year course of AI therapy after primary surgery for breast cancer. Outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We compared the following strategies: no intervention; one-time bone mineral density (BMD) screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; annual BMD screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; and universal bisphosphonate therapy. Results ICERs for annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis, annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteopenia, and universal treatment with oral bisphosphonates were $87,300, $129,300, and $283,600 per QALY gained, respectively. One-time BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis or osteopenia was dominated. Our results were sensitive to age at the initiation of AI therapy, type of bisphosphonates, post-treatment residual effect of bisphosphonates, and a potential adjuvant benefit of intravenous bisphosphonates. Conclusion In postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant AIs for HR-positive EBC, a policy of baseline and annual BMD screening followed by selective treatment with oral bisphosphonates for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is a cost-effective use of societal resources.


2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shijing Qiu ◽  
George W. Divine ◽  
Saroj Palnitkar ◽  
Pooja Kulkarni ◽  
Trent S. Guthrie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document