Rates of Overall Survival and Intracranial Control in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Era for Patients With Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer With and Without Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

8560 Background: Although thoracic twice-daily radiotherapy (TDRT) is one of standards of care for small cell lung cancer, its impact on brain metastases remains unknown. This study aimed to compare TDRT with once-daily radiotherapy (ODRT) for the brain metastases rate after prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small cell lung cancer. Methods: Consecutive patients received TDRT (45Gy/30f)/ODRT(50-66Gy/25-33f), chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation were retrieved from eight hospitals’ databases between 2003 and 2016. The endpoints included brain metastases, progression-free survival and overall survival. Brain metastases rate was evaluated using competing risk analysis. A 1:1 propensity score matching approach was used to control confounding between these two groups. Confounding covariates included eight demographic variables and eight treatment related covariates. Results: Of the 778 eligible patients with median age of 55-year (IQR, 48-61), 204 (26.2%) were female. At a median follow-up time of 23.6 months (IQR, 14.2- 38.2), 131 (16.8%) experienced brain metastases. The rates in TDRT were significantly higher than ODRT (3-year, 26.0% vs. 16.9%; HR = 1.55, 95%CI 1.06-2.26, P = 0.03). Of the 338 matched patients (169 in ODRT vs. 169 in TDRT), 60 (17.8%) experienced brain metastases with 3-year rate of 14.9% in ODRT vs 26.0% in TDRT (HR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.02-2.88, P = 0.04). Progression-free survival was similar in both the whole cohort and the matched one. Overall survival in ODRT tended to be significantly longer after matching (median, 47.2 months in ODRT vs. 32.8 months in TDRT; HR = 1.41, 95%CI 0.99-2.01, P = 0.06). When jointly evaluated biologically effective dose (BED), start of any therapy to the end of radiotherapy (SER) and TDRT/ODRT in the multivariable analysis, the impact of ODRT/TDRT on overall survival become more significant (HR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.05-2.71, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with small cell lung cancer who were treated with thoracic TDRT appeared to have higher risk of brain metastases than those with ODRT, which strongly supports the need for further prospective randomized clinical trials, especially in China or other parts of Asia.

Download Full-text

Functional Imaging in Lung Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2005.08.854 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 23 (14) ◽

pp. 3203-3211 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Lalitha K. Shankar ◽

Daniel C. Sullivan

Keyword(s):

Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽

Lung Cancer ◽

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Functional Imaging ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell ◽

Resonance Imaging ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Dynamic Contrast Enhancement

Accurate detection of the presence and extent of disease is vital in the management of non–small-cell lung cancer. While computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging tend to be the routine diagnostic modalities used in the management of lung cancer, there have been significant advances in the field of functional and molecular imaging. In this article, we review the performance of the functional imaging techniques that are currently available for the evaluation of non–small-cell lung cancer. The techniques range from evaluation of glucose metabolism in tumors with fluorodeoxyglucose, to evaluation of proliferation with fluorothymidine and evaluation of tumor hypoxia with agents such as fluoromisonidazole. Magnetic resonance imaging with an emphasis on dynamic contrast enhancement of tumors as well as detecting of malignant lymph nodes with targeted contrast agents is discussed. Emerging technologies such as lung imaging fluorescence endoscopy are considered. The role of functional imaging in planning, predicting response to, and evaluating effects of, various therapies is explored.

Download Full-text