scholarly journals Role of Visual Field Reliability Indices in Ruling Out Glaucoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harsha L. Rao ◽  
Ravi K. Yadav ◽  
Viquar U. Begum ◽  
Uday K. Addepalli ◽  
Nikhil S. Choudhari ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 685-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpa Raman ◽  
Yeap Khy Ching ◽  
Premala D. Sivagurunathan ◽  
Norlina Ramli ◽  
Khairul H. Mohd. Khalid

1981 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 565-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jules C. Abrams

The role of visual problems in learning disability has been a source of considerable controversy for many years. One major issue in the continuing argument is the frequent confusion of labels and concepts in the visual field. It is important to view vision as a psychophysiologic mechanism and to differentiate it from a mechanistic orientation emphasizing the eyes. Most visual problems related to learning disability represent a breakdown in the ability of the eyes to function in an harmonious fashion, that is, some interference in binocular function. While visual defects should not be confused with defects in visual perception, the identification and treatment of visual problems is an important element in the diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities.


1979 ◽  
Vol 204 (1157) ◽  
pp. 415-434 ◽  

Receptive field position and orientation disparities are both properties of binocularly discharged striate neurons. Receptive field position disparities have been used as a key element in the neural theory for binocular depth discrimination. Since most striate cells in the cat are binocular, these position disparities require that cells immediately adjacent to one another in the cortex should show a random scatter in their monocular receptive field positions. Superimposed on the progressive topographical representation of the visual field on the striate cortex there is experimental evidence for a localized monocular receptive field position scatter. The suggestion is examined that the binocular position disparities are built up out of the two monocular position scatters. An examination of receptive field orientation disparities and their relation to the random variation in the monocular preferred orientations of immediately adjacent striate neurons also leads to the conclusion that binocular orientation disparities are a consequence of the two monocular scatters. As for receptive field position, the local scatter in preferred orientation is superimposed on a progressive representation of orientation over larger areas of the cortex. The representation in the striate cortex of visual field position and of stimulus orientation is examined in relation to the correlation between the disparities in receptive field position and preferred orientation. The role of orientation disparities in binocular vision is reviewed.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e100898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Bormann ◽  
Sascha A. Wolfer ◽  
Wibke Hachmann ◽  
Wolf A. Lagrèze ◽  
Lars Konieczny

Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Jody Stanley ◽  
Jason D. Forte ◽  
Olivia Carter

When dissimilar images are presented to each eye, the images will alternate every few seconds in a phenomenon known as binocular rivalry. Recent research has found evidence of a bias towards one image at the initial ‘onset’ period of rivalry that varies across the peripheral visual field. To determine the role that visual field location plays in and around the fovea at onset, trained observers were presented small orthogonal achromatic grating patches at various locations across the central 3° of visual space for 1-s and 60-s intervals. Results reveal stronger bias at onset than during continuous rivalry, and evidence of temporal hemifield dominance across observers, however, the nature of the hemifield effects differed between individuals and interacted with overall eye dominance. Despite using small grating patches, a high proportion of mixed percept was still reported, with more mixed percept at onset along the vertical midline, in general, and in increasing proportions with eccentricity in the lateral hemifields. Results show that even within the foveal range, onset rivalry bias varies across visual space, and differs in degree and sensitivity to biases in average dominance over continuous viewing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document