Epidemiology and Management of Zenker Diverticulum in a Low-Threshold Single-payer Health Care System

Author(s):  
Sandra Uoti ◽  
Saana E-M. Andersson ◽  
Eric Robinson ◽  
Jari Räsänen ◽  
Ville Kytö ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Petrera ◽  
Federico Yanez‐Siller ◽  
Daniel Whelan ◽  
Graeme Hoit ◽  
Maryam Mahjoob ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. e61-e69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Rosella ◽  
Kathy Kornas ◽  
Zhan Yao ◽  
Douglas G. Manuel ◽  
Catherine Bornbaum ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice S. Kwon ◽  
Feng Qiu ◽  
Mark S. Carey ◽  
Lawrence F. Paszat ◽  
E. Francis Cook

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jui-Fen Rachel Lu ◽  
Tung-Liang Chiang

AbstractThis study aims to present an overview of the evolutionary policy process in reforming the health care system in Taiwan, through dissecting the forces of knowledge, social-cultural context, economic resources and political system. We further identify factors, which had a significant impact on health care reform policies in Taiwan through illustrative policy examples. One of the most illuminating examples highlighted is the design and implementation of a single-payer National Health Insurance (NHI) program in 1995, after nearly five years of planning efforts (1988–1993) and a two-year legislative marathon. The NHI is one of the most popular social programs ever undertaken in the history of Taiwan, which greatly enhances financial protection against unexpected medical expenses and assures access to health services. Nonetheless, health care reform still has an unfinished agenda. Despite high satisfaction ratings, Taiwan’s health care system today is encountering mounting pressure for new reforms as a result of its rapidly aging population, economic stagnation, and imbalanced NHI checkbook. Although there may exist some heterogeneous system characteristics and challenges among different health care systems around the world, Taiwan’s experiences in reforming its health care system for the past few decades may provide valuable lessons for countries going through rapid economic and political transition.


JAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 322 (19) ◽  
pp. 1922
Author(s):  
Steffie Woolhandler ◽  
David U. Himmelstein

1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Anderson ◽  
Alistair Catterson ◽  
Michael Gaudet ◽  
Mamta Gautam ◽  
Peter J Kerr ◽  
...  

Objectives: To examine current concerns that in the Canadian single-payer mental health care system, the “rich worried well” (that is, wealthy individuals who are worried yet mentally well) may overuse psychiatric services, while low-income, uninsured mentally ill individuals may remain undertreated. The current study focuses on the mental health care in the Canadian region of Ottawa-Carleton, where a single-payer system provides universal access to mental health services, to assess how psychiatric services are provided by psychiatrists in private practice. Method: One hundred and seven private psychiatrists working in the region of Ottawa-Carleton completed a questionnaire which contained questions about the sociodemographic characteristics and background of the psychiatrists themselves and which asked the psychiatrists specific questions about the sociodemographic status, diagnosis, and treatment of each patient seen on November 10, 1994. Results: Approximately 93% of the patients seen met criteria for one or more Axis I disorders, of which mood and anxiety disorders were the most common. Wealthier patients were relatively underrepresented among the patients treated by the private psychiatrists. In addition, we found no significant differences in the distribution of Axis I, Axis II, and Axis III disorders between patients earning below $30 000 per year compared with patients earning above $60 000 per year. Conclusions: Our results suggest that outpatient psychiatric care delivered by private psychiatrists in a Canadian single-payer system targets primarily individuals with major psychiatric disorders and does not seem to favour “the worried well.” Larger epidemiological studies with independent assessments of psychiatric populations are necessary to confirm our findings.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-114
Author(s):  
Robert B. Matthews ◽  
G. Keith Jenkins ◽  
Joey Robertson

The passage of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA” or “Obamacare”) in 2010 promises to bring about significant changes in the way that health care is provided and paid for in the United States of America (USA). Supporters of ACA point to a 2000 WHO study of worldwide health care systems in which the USA ranked 37th as justification for proposed changes, and many of them have expressed a preference for ultimately implementing a single-payer or single-provider system (such as currently exists in Canada or the United Kingdom). Detractors, who generally label the act Obamacare, have expressed concerns about whether the act can achieve its stated objectives, whether it represents a negative step instead of a positive one, and whether the ultimate goal of a single-payer or single-provider system is desirable one or even an achievable one. In the context of the ongoing debate over health care in the USA, this paper reviews the WHO study and subsequent comparative analyses of world health care systems to address the following questions:Does the USA really have the 37th best health care system in the world?Does either a “single-payer” health care system or a “single-provider” health care system offer prospects for significant improvement?What model or models for delivery of health care services represent “best practices” and how can and should they be emulated? 


1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 916-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen R. Shaffer ◽  
Andrew J. Cutler ◽  
Paul D. Wellstone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document