No Strong Evidence on Liver Transplant for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Over Portal Vein Embolization Associated With Liver Resection—Reply

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svein Dueland ◽  
Sheraz Yaqub ◽  
Pål-Dag Line
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihai-Calin Pavel ◽  
Raquel Casanova ◽  
Laia Estalella ◽  
Robert Memba ◽  
Erik Llàcer-Millán ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Liver resection (LR) in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer remains the only curative treatment. Perioperative chemotherapy improves prognosis of these patients. However, there are concerns regarding the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on liver regeneration, which is a key event in avoiding liver failure after LR. The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration after (LR) or portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of the type of chemotherapy, number of cycles, and time between end of treatment and procedure (LR or PVE) and to investigate whether there is an association between degree of hypertrophy and postoperative liver failure. Methods This meta-analysis will include studies reporting liver regeneration rates in patients submitted to LR or PVE. Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases will be searched. Only studies comparing neoadjuvant vs no chemotherapy, or comparing chemotherapy characteristics (bevacizumab administration, number of cycles, and time from finishing chemotherapy until intervention), will be included. We will select studies from 1990 to present. Two researchers will individually screen the identified records, according to a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcome will be future liver remnant regeneration rate. Bias of the studies will be evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool, and quality of evidence for all outcomes will be determined with the GRADE system. The data will be registered in a predesigned database. If selected studies are sufficiently homogeneous, we will perform a meta-analysis of reported results. In the event of a substantial heterogeneity, a qualitative systematic review will be performed. Discussion The results of this systematic review may help to better identify the patients affected by liver metastasis that could present low regeneration rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These patients are at risk to develop liver failure after extended hepatectomies and therefore are not good candidates for such aggressive procedures. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020178481 (July 5, 2020).


2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 163-170
Author(s):  
Lou-Anne Acevedo-Moreno ◽  
Federico Aucejo

AbstractColorectal carcinoma continues to be a leading cause in cancer-related mortality with more than 130,000 new cases diagnosed annually in the United States. About 50% of patients will develop colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). Liver resection continues to be the mainstay therapy in the management of CRLM and is associated with 25 to 60% 5-year survival. Alternative nonsurgical therapies offer modest survival when CRLM is unresectable. Herein, we provide an overview of key aspects of surgical approaches to the treatment of CRLM.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihai-Calin Pavel ◽  
Raquel Casanova ◽  
Laia Estalella ◽  
Robert Memba ◽  
Erik Llàcer-Millán ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Liver resection (LR) in patients with liver metastasis from colo-rectal cancer remains the only curative treatment. Perioperative chemotherapy improves prognosis of these patients. However, there are concerns regarding the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on liver regeneration, which is a key event in avoiding liver failure after LR. The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration after (LR) or portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with liver metastasis from colo-rectal cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of the type of chemotherapy, number of cycles and time between end of treatment and procedure (LR or PVE) and to investigate whether there is an association between degree of hypertrophy and postoperative liver failure.Methods: The design of this systematic review will follow the current recommendations of PRISMA. Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases will be searched We will include studies reporting liver regeneration rates in patients submitted to LR or PVE. Only studies comparing neoadjuvant vs no chemotherapy, or comparing chemotherapy characteristics (bevacizumab administration, number of cycles and time from finishing chemotherapy until intervention) will be included. We will select studies from 1990 to present. Two researchers will individually screen the identified records, according to a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcome will be future liver remnant regeneration rate. Bias of the studies will be evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool and quality of evidence for all outcomes will be determined with the GRADE system. The data will be registered in a predesigned database. If selected studies are sufficiently homogeneous, we will perform a meta-analysis of reported results. In the event of a substantial heterogeneity, a qualitive systematic review will be performed.Discussion: The results of this systematic review may help to better identify the patients affected by liver metastasis that could present low regeneration rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These patients are at risk to develop liver failure after extended hepatectomies and therefore are not good candidates for such aggressive procedures.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020178481 (July 5th 2020).


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ii42
Author(s):  
K. Yanaga ◽  
K. Yoshida ◽  
T. Hasegawa ◽  
M. Ogawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document