scholarly journals Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth

Author(s):  
Hossein Ghaeminia ◽  
John Perry ◽  
Marloes EL Nienhuijs ◽  
Verena Toedtling ◽  
Marcia Tummers ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Hossein Ghaeminia ◽  
Marloes EL Nienhuijs ◽  
Verena Toedtling ◽  
John Perry ◽  
Marcia Tummers ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahid Afzal ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Kiaran Weil ◽  
Helen V Worthington ◽  
Arjen van Wijk ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Edmund Bailey ◽  
Helen V Worthington ◽  
Arjen van Wijk ◽  
Julian M Yates ◽  
Paul Coulthard ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nasma M. Al-fahad ◽  
Wael Sheet Shallawe

Objective: The aim is to compare between the effect of cool jaw wraps and dexamethasone injection on postoperative pain and evaluate the quality of life after surgical removal of lower wisdom tooth.Methods: Extraction of impacted lower third molar will surgically operate (by the same difficulty of surgical extraction and same operator) on 30 patients, which divide into three groups, each group have 10 patients.We will instruct the patients in cool jaw wrap group to put cool jaw wrap after the operation. While the second group give dexamethasone injection after the operation. The last group which is the control group will left them with the usual instruction postoperatively.This study evaluates the facial pain, swelling, and trismus on days 1,2 and 7 postoperatively. Objective measurements of swelling, pain, and trismus were undertaken at days 1, 2 and 7. The quality of life questionnaire was estimated at day 7 postoperatively.Results: Cool jaw wrap showed no significant differences on the postoperative pain when it used after surgical removal of the lower third molar BUT have significant differences on the Quality of life of patients.Conclusion: Cool jaw face wrap can be recommended as a safe method that participates in some degree to reduce postoperative pain, it easy to handle, comfort, avoiding damage by freezing due to the barrier between cool jaw and skin and the patient can avoid the side effect of dexamethasone and the phobia from the injection.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahid Afzal ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Kiaran Weil ◽  
Helen V Worthington ◽  
Arjen van Wijk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
Nanda Ghoshal

A 37 years, the old male patient reported the chief complaint of inability to open mouth since 10-11 months and recently pain and swelling resulting from wisdom teeth of both sides limited the mouth opening severely (<9mm, less than one finger opening) that he could not take solid food properly. After partial relief and mouth opening (12mm) with antibiotic therapy, the patient was examined and diagnosed with oral submucous fibrosis (osmf) along with impacted molars on both sides. Treatment was planned with a conservative approach consisted of pharmacotherapy and physiotherapy for osmf and surgical removal of impacted third molars of both sides. Mouth opening was improved gradually (>15mm after 3 weeks, >22mm after 6 weeks,>27 mm after 9 weeks).


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis McArdle

In 2000 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published clinical guidance that advised against the removal of disease-free wisdom teeth (prophylactic removal).1 This was mainly driven by the perception in the UK that up to 44% of all removed third molars were disease free and consequently had no clinical indication for removal.1,2 But does the NICE guidance, which has become akin to scripture on this issue, have everything right?.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document