2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahid Afzal ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Kiaran Weil ◽  
Helen V Worthington ◽  
Arjen van Wijk ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hossein Ghaeminia ◽  
John Perry ◽  
Marloes EL Nienhuijs ◽  
Verena Toedtling ◽  
Marcia Tummers ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Edmund Bailey ◽  
Helen V Worthington ◽  
Arjen van Wijk ◽  
Julian M Yates ◽  
Paul Coulthard ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nasma M. Al-fahad ◽  
Wael Sheet Shallawe

Objective: The aim is to compare between the effect of cool jaw wraps and dexamethasone injection on postoperative pain and evaluate the quality of life after surgical removal of lower wisdom tooth.Methods: Extraction of impacted lower third molar will surgically operate (by the same difficulty of surgical extraction and same operator) on 30 patients, which divide into three groups, each group have 10 patients.We will instruct the patients in cool jaw wrap group to put cool jaw wrap after the operation. While the second group give dexamethasone injection after the operation. The last group which is the control group will left them with the usual instruction postoperatively.This study evaluates the facial pain, swelling, and trismus on days 1,2 and 7 postoperatively. Objective measurements of swelling, pain, and trismus were undertaken at days 1, 2 and 7. The quality of life questionnaire was estimated at day 7 postoperatively.Results: Cool jaw wrap showed no significant differences on the postoperative pain when it used after surgical removal of the lower third molar BUT have significant differences on the Quality of life of patients.Conclusion: Cool jaw face wrap can be recommended as a safe method that participates in some degree to reduce postoperative pain, it easy to handle, comfort, avoiding damage by freezing due to the barrier between cool jaw and skin and the patient can avoid the side effect of dexamethasone and the phobia from the injection.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahid Afzal ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Kiaran Weil ◽  
Helen V Worthington ◽  
Arjen van Wijk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
Nanda Ghoshal

A 37 years, the old male patient reported the chief complaint of inability to open mouth since 10-11 months and recently pain and swelling resulting from wisdom teeth of both sides limited the mouth opening severely (<9mm, less than one finger opening) that he could not take solid food properly. After partial relief and mouth opening (12mm) with antibiotic therapy, the patient was examined and diagnosed with oral submucous fibrosis (osmf) along with impacted molars on both sides. Treatment was planned with a conservative approach consisted of pharmacotherapy and physiotherapy for osmf and surgical removal of impacted third molars of both sides. Mouth opening was improved gradually (>15mm after 3 weeks, >22mm after 6 weeks,>27 mm after 9 weeks).


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil Khzam ◽  
Adam Fell ◽  
Anthony Fisher ◽  
Paul Kim ◽  
Usman A. Khan ◽  
...  

Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammation of the tooth supporting structures. It leads to bone and attachment loss which is irreversible. Extraction of horizontally impacted lower third molar (L3M) teeth may result in localized periodontal pockets at the distal aspect of the adjacent lower second molars (L2M). We present a case of a 21-year-old male who suffered from a swelling and pain around his lower right second molar following surgical removal of a mesioangular impacted lower right third molar. We showed that oral hygiene measures, surgical access, mixture of autogenous and synthetic bone graft, and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) were enough to control the problem.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3614
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Trybek ◽  
Magda Aniko-Włodarczyk ◽  
Olga Preuss ◽  
Aleksandra Jaroń

Despite the frequent discussion of complications associated with surgical removal of wisdom teeth in the scientific literature, increased mobility of the second molar, which can affect the clinical status of the pulp, is often downplayed or overlooked. This study aimed to evaluate surgical removal of an impacted third molar on the change in the electrosensitivity of the pulp of the mandibular second molar. Sixty patients consecutively presenting to the Department of Oral Surgery to remove an impacted mandibular third molar were included in the study. Clinical examinations of pulp sensitivity of second molars in both the study and control groups were evaluated before the procedure, seven days after the procedure, and eight weeks after the procedure. The surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar significantly affected the pulp sensitivity of the second molar.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document