scholarly journals Stacked P ‐to‐ S and S ‐to‐ P receiver functions determination of crustal thickness, V p , and V s : The H‐V stacking method

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 1487-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine A. Rychert ◽  
Nicholas Harmon

2018 ◽  
Vol 216 (2) ◽  
pp. 1304-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Luo ◽  
Lupei Zhu ◽  
Rong Huang ◽  
Yinhe Luo ◽  
Xiaohuan Jiang ◽  
...  




2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (3) ◽  
pp. 2009-2026
Author(s):  
Frederik Link ◽  
Georg Rümpker ◽  
Ayoub Kaviani

SUMMARY We present a technique to derive robust estimates for the crustal thickness and elastic properties, including anisotropy, from shear wave splitting of converted phases in receiver functions. We combine stacking procedures with a correction scheme for the splitting effect of the crustal converted Ps-phase and its first reverberation, the PpPs-phase, where we also allow for a predefined dipping Moho. The incorporation of two phases stabilizes the analysis procedure and allows to simultaneously solve for the crustal thickness, the ratio of average P- to S-wave velocities, the percentage of anisotropy and the fast-axis direction. The stacking is based on arrival times and polarizations computed using a ray-based algorithm. Synthetic tests show the robustness of the technique and its applicability to tectonic settings where dip of the Moho is significant. These tests also demonstrate that the effects of a dipping layer boundary may overprint a possible anisotropic signature. To constrain the uncertainty of our results we perform statistical tests based on a bootstrapping approach. We distinguish between different model classes by comparing the coherency of the stacked amplitudes after moveout correction. We apply the new technique to real-data examples from different tectonic regimes and show that coherency of the stacked receiver functions can be improved, when anisotropy and a dipping Moho are included in the analysis. The examples underline the advantages of statistical analyses when dealing with stacking procedures and potentially ambiguous solutions.





2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Farrapo Albuquerque ◽  
César Garcia Pavão ◽  
Rafael Toscani Gomes da Silveira ◽  
Iago Guilherme dos Santos ◽  
George Sand França


2014 ◽  
Vol 611 ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Li ◽  
Mengtan Gao ◽  
Qingju Wu


2013 ◽  
Vol 609 ◽  
pp. 82-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Assumpção ◽  
Mei Feng ◽  
Andrés Tassara ◽  
Jordi Julià


2004 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Narcía-López ◽  
R. R. Castro ◽  
C. J. Rebollar
Keyword(s):  


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Knapmeyer-Endrun ◽  
Felix Bissig ◽  
Nicolas Compaire ◽  
Raphael Garcia ◽  
Rakshit Joshi ◽  
...  

<p>NASA’s InSight mission arrived on Mars in November 2018 and deployed the first very broad-band seismometer, SEIS, on the planet’s surface. SEIS has been collecting data continuously since early February 2019, by now recording more than 400 events of different types. InSight aims at enhancing our understanding of the internal structure and dynamics of Mars, including better constraints on its crustal thickness. Various models based on topography and gravity observed from the orbit currently vary in average crustal thickness from 30 km to more than 100 km, with important implications for Mars’ thermal evolution, and the partitioning of silicates and heat-producing elements between different layers of Mars.</p><p>We present P-to-S and S-to-P receiver functions, which are available for 4 and 3 marsquakes, respectively, up to now. Out of all of the marsquakes recorded to date, these are the only ones with clear enough P- or S-arrivals not dominated by scattering to make them suitable for the analysis. All of the quakes are located at comparatively small epicentral distances, between 25° and 40°. We observe three consistent phases within the first 10 seconds of the P-to-S receiver functions. The S-to-P receiver functions also show a consistent first phase. Later arrivals are harder to pinpoint, which could be due to the comparatively shallow incidence of the S-waves at the considered distances, which prevents the generation of converted waves. Identification of later multiple phases in the P-to-S receiver functions likewise remains inconclusive. To obtain better constraints on velocity, we also calculated apparent velocity curves from the P-to-S receiver functions, but these provide meaningful results for only one event so far, implying a large uncertainty. Due to difficulties in clearly identifying multiples, the receiver functions can currently be explained by either two crustal layers and a thin (25-30 km) crust or three crustal layers and a thicker (40-45 km) crust at the landing site. This model range already improves the present constraints by providing a new maximum value of less than 70 km for the average crustal thickness. Information from noise autocorrelations as a complementary method, identification of P-reverberations and S-precursors in the event recordings, and more extensive modeling, ultimately including 3D-effects, are considered to further our understanding of the waveforms and tighten the constraints on the crust.</p>



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document