NASA maps the inside of Mars

NASA’s Insight mission has used seismic waves to map the inside of the red planet for the first time, as Keith Cooper reports.

Potential Pitfalls in the Analysis and Structural Interpretation of Seismic Data from the Mars InSight Mission

ABSTRACT The Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) of the InSight mission to Mars has been providing direct information on Martian interior structure and dynamics of that planet since it landed. Compared with seismic recordings on the Earth, ground-motion measurements acquired by SEIS on Mars are not only made under dramatically different ambient noise conditions, but also include idiosyncratic signals that arise from coupling between different InSight sensors and spacecraft components. This work is to synthesize what is known about these signal types, illustrate how they can manifest in waveforms and noise correlations, and present pitfalls in structural interpretations based on standard seismic analysis methods. We show that glitches (a type of prominent transient signal) can produce artifacts in ambient noise correlations. Sustained signals that vary in frequency, such as lander modes that are affected by variations in temperature and wind conditions over the course of the Martian sol, can also contaminate ambient noise results. Therefore, both types of signals have the potential to bias interpretation in terms of subsurface layering. We illustrate that signal processing in the presence of identified nonseismic signals must be informed by an understanding of the underlying physical processes in order for high-fidelity waveforms of ground motion to be extracted. Whereas the origins of the most idiosyncratic signals are well understood, the 2.4 Hz resonance remains debated, and the literature does not contain an explanation of its fine spectral structure. Even though the selection of idiosyncratic signal types discussed in this article may not be exhaustive, we provide guidance on the best practices for enhancing the robustness of structural interpretations.

Numerical modelling of recent impacts on Mars and contribution to InSight mission science

<p>The crust on Mars has been structurally affected by various geologic processes such as impacts, volcanism, mantle flow and erosion. Previous observations and modelling point to a dynamically active interior in early Martian history, that for some reason was followed by a rapid drop in heat transport. Such a change has significantly influenced the geological, geophysical and geochemical evolution of the planet, including the history of water and climate. Impact-induced seismic signature is dependent on the target properties (conditions in the planetary crust and interior) at the time of crater formation; Thus, we can use simulations of impact cratering mechanics as a tool to probe the interior properties of a planet.</p><p>Contrary to large impacts happening in Mars’ early geologic history, the present-day impact bombardment is limited to small meter-size crater-forming impacts (in the atmosphere and on the ground), which are also natural seismic sources (Daubar et al., 2018, 2020; Neidhart et al., 2020). Impact simulations, in tandem with NASA InSight seismic observations (Benerdt et al., 2020, Giardini et al., 2020), can help understand the crustal properties over the course of Mars’ evolution, including the state of Mars’ crust today. Our most recent numerical investigations include: estimating the seismic efficiency and moment from small meter-size impact events, tracking pressure propagation from the impact point into far field, transfer of impact energy into seismic energy, etc (Rajsic et al., 2020, Wojcicka et al., 2020). Understanding coupling between impact crater formation process with the generation and progression of seismic energy can help identify small impact everts in seismic data on Mars. We also looked at the same process on the Earth (Neidhart et al., 2020) and the Moon (Rajsic, et al., this issue).</p><p>Since the landing of the NASA InSight mission on Mars, there was a dozen known new impacts (Miljkovic et al., 2021). However, all but one impact occurred much too far away (3000 to 8400 km distance from the InSight lander) to be within the detectability threshold estimates (Teanby et al., 2015; Wojcicka et al., 2020). About 50% of the observed craters were likely single impacts and the other 50% were evidently cluster craters with less than 40 individual craters in the largest cluster. The largest single crater was ~14 m in diameter, and the largest crater in a cluster was ~13 m (Neidhart et al., this issue), consistent with crater cluster observations (Daubar et al., 2013). The one impact that had a possibility of being detected by SEIS was 1.5 m in diameter at 37 km distance (Daubar et al. 2020).</p><p>Considering that orbital imaging is limited in space and time, these known new impacts represent only a fraction of the total number of impacts that have occurred on Mars in the last ~2 years. According to impact flux calculations (Teanby and Wookey, 2011), there should have been ~3000 detectable craters, larger than 1 m in diameter, formed on Mars since InSight landed. If any of these unobserved impacts have been large enough and close enough to InSight to detect seismically, we have not yet discerned them in the seismic data.</p><p>References:</p><p>Banerdt, W.B. et al. (2020) <em>Nature Geosci. </em>13, 183-189.</p><p>Giardini, D. et al. (2020) <em>Nature Geosci. </em>13, 205-212.</p><p>Daubar, I.J. et al. (2020) <em>J. Geophys. Res. Planets</em>, 125: e2020JE006382.</p><p>Wójcicka, N. et al. (2020) <em>J. Geophys. Res. Planets</em>, 125, e2020JE006540.</p><p>Rajšić et al. (2021) <em>J. Geophys. Res. Planets</em>, 126, e2020JE006662.</p><p>Daubar et al. (2013) <em>Icarus</em> 225, 506-516.</p><p>Teanby, N.A. & Wookey, J. (2011) <em>PEPI</em> 186, 70-80.</p><p>Neidhart, T. et al. (2020) <em>PASA</em>, 38, E016.</p><p>Teanby, N.A. et al. (2015) <em>Icarus</em> 256, 46-62.</p><p>Miljkovic, K. et al. (2021) <em>LPSC</em>, LPI Contribution No. 1758.</p>

First approximations to the energy release of giant dikes at Cerberus Fossae, Mars

<p>Historical dike intrusions in the vicinity of volcanic edifices on Earth are known to produce swarms of seismic activity with cumulative seismic moments between 1·10<sup>12</sup> and 1·10<sup>20</sup> Nm, equivalent to moment magnitudes between 2 and 7. On Mars, long linear graben systems are likely to host giant dike complexes at depth, which possibly produced significant seismicity during their intrusion. Not only this, but dike intrusions are also candidates to produce crustal seismicity at present day, which may be detected during the lifespan of the InSight mission. In this work we infer the possible geometry of dikes underneath Cerberus Fossae, and make estimations of the energy released during their intrusion.</p><p>We used cross section area balancing on topographic profiles orthogonal to several of the Cerberus Fossae graben to estimate proxies for the geometry of the underlying dikes (aperture, height, depth, etc.). This technique has already been used to approximate dike properties at the nearby Elysium Fossae, with successful results. At Cerberus Fossae, the obtained dike aspect ratios are consistent with sublinear scaling, which is characteristic of fluid-induced fractures (as expected for dikes). These results support the presence of giant dikes underneath Cerberus, which may be up to 700 m thick, 140 km long, and have heights of up to 20 km.</p><p>Additionally, we used the inferred geometries and assumptions about the host rock mechanical properties to estimate various energy quantities related to dike intrusion, and compared them with the energy releases in terrestrial diking episodes. Two calculations are of special interest; M<sub>d</sub>, the energy associated to dike inflation, and M<sub>s</sub>, an approximation to the cumulative seismic moment release. The obtained M<sub>d</sub> values are between 3.1·10<sup>20</sup> and 5.0·10<sup>21</sup> Nm, and are 1 to 2 orders of magnitude larger than the equivalent moments in terrestrial events. M<sub>s</sub> was calculated from M<sub>d</sub> with two key assumptions; 1) that all aseismic energy was released by the dike, and 2) values of seismic efficiency (the percentage of seismic relative to the total energy released) based on terrestrial examples. The obtained M<sub>s</sub> are between 6.3·10<sup>19</sup> and 2.2·10<sup>21</sup> Nm, which are equivalent to moment magnitudes of 6.5 and 7.9. These are comparable to, albeit slightly larger than, the cumulative moments of some of the largest terrestrial diking events, such as the first episode in the Manda-Hararo sequence (Ethiopia, 2005, M<sub>s </sub>= 6.2) or the Miyake-jima event (Japan, 2000, M<sub>s </sub>= 6.8).</p><p>The Elysium volcanic province is thought to have been active until very recent times, and possibly even at present day. If this is the case, then intrusions in the lower size of the spectrum investigated at Cerberus, and smaller-sized events, may be detected by InSight as a series of crustal seismic events with cumulative moment magnitudes <6. Further research is needed to fully assess the validity of the comparisons between terrestrial and Martian events, and the possible energy releases of dike-induced marsquakes.</p>

Joint inversion of receiver functions and apparent incidence angles to investigate the crustal structure of Mars

<p>Since InSight (the Interior Exploration using Geodesy and Heat Transport) landed 26 months ago and deployed an ultra sensitive broadband seismometer(SEIS) on the surface of Mars, around 500 seismic events of diverse variety have been detected, making it possible to directly analyze the subsurface properties of Mars for the very first time. One of the primary goals of the mission is to retrieve the crustal structure below the landing site. Current estimates differ by more than 100% for the average crustal thickness. Since data from orbital gravity measurementsprovide information on relative variations of crustal thickness but not absolute values, this landing site measurement could serve as a tie point to retrieve global crustal structure models. To do so, we propose using a joint inversion of receiver functions and apparent incidence angles, which contain information on absolute S-wave velocities of the subsurface. Since receiver function inversions suffer from a velocity depth trade-off, we in addition exploit a simple relation which defines apparent S-wave velocity as a function of observed apparent P-wave incidence angles to constrain the parameter space. Finally we use the Neighbourhood Algorithm for the inversion of a suitable joint objective function. The resulting ensemble of models is then used to derive the full uncertainty estimates for each model parameter. Before its application on data from InSight mission, we successfully tested the method on Mars synthetics and terrestrial data from various geological settings using both single and multiple events. Using the same method, we have previously been able to constrain the S-wave velocity and depth for the first inter-crustal layer of Mars between 1.7 to 2.1 km/s and 8 to 11 km, respectively. Here we present the results of applying this technique on our selected data set from the InSight mission. Results show that the data can be explained equally well by models with 2 or 3 crustal layers with constant velocities. Due to the limited data set it is difficult to resolve the ambiguity of this bi-modal solution. We therefore investigate information theoretic statistical tests as a model selection criteria and discuss their relevance and implications in seismological framework.</p><div></div><div></div><div></div>