scholarly journals Propagation and evolution of electric fields associated with solar wind pressure pulses based on spacecraft and ground-based observations

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (8) ◽  
pp. 8446-8461 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Takahashi ◽  
Y. Kasaba ◽  
Y. Nishimura ◽  
A. Shinbori ◽  
T. Kikuchi ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (A8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Claude Cerisier ◽  
Aurélie Marchaudon ◽  
Jean-Michel Bosqued ◽  
Kathryn McWilliams ◽  
Harald U. Frey ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. T. Edberg ◽  
H. Nilsson ◽  
A. O. Williams ◽  
M. Lester ◽  
S. E. Milan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 3421-3429 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Diéval ◽  
G. Stenberg ◽  
H. Nilsson ◽  
N. J. T. Edberg ◽  
S. Barabash

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 2201-2211 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. V. Sarafopoulos

Abstract. We provide conclusive observational evidence demonstrating that a solar wind pressure pulse produces a twin-vortex system of ionospheric currents, while a stepwise pressure increase/decrease creates a single vortex structure, at high-latitude ground magnetograms. Multi-satellite (Wind, Geotail, Interball, IMP 8 and GOES 8) and multi-instrument observations of plasma and magnetic field confirm with in situ measurements that solar wind inherent pressure pulses and stepwise variations strike on the Earth's magnetosphere in a global scale. The ground signatures are scrutinized in detail and the twin- or single-vortex current systems are studied using the IMAGE array stations. One more finding of this work is that a single vortex can produce monopolar and bipolar features, depending on the station position relative to the overhead travelling convection vortex (TCV). All of the above observational evidence confirms Glassmeier's (1992) prediction model that associates solar wind's steep changes of pressure with ionospheric TCVs.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hanuise ◽  
J. C. Cerisier ◽  
F. Auchère ◽  
K. Bocchialini ◽  
S. Bruinsma ◽  
...  

Abstract. During the last week of May 2003, the solar active region AR 10365 produced a large number of flares, several of which were accompanied by Coronal Mass Ejections (CME). Specifically on 27 and 28 May three halo CMEs were observed which had a significant impact on geospace. On 29 May, upon their arrival at the L1 point, in front of the Earth's magnetosphere, two interplanetary shocks and two additional solar wind pressure pulses were recorded by the ACE spacecraft. The interplanetary magnetic field data showed the clear signature of a magnetic cloud passing ACE. In the wake of the successive increases in solar wind pressure, the magnetosphere became strongly compressed and the sub-solar magnetopause moved inside five Earth radii. At low altitudes the increased energy input to the magnetosphere was responsible for a substantial enhancement of Region-1 field-aligned currents. The ionospheric Hall currents also intensified and the entire high-latitude current system moved equatorward by about 10°. Several substorms occurred during this period, some of them - but not all - apparently triggered by the solar wind pressure pulses. The storm's most notable consequences on geospace, including space weather effects, were (1) the expansion of the auroral oval, and aurorae seen at mid latitudes, (2) the significant modification of the total electron content in the sunlight high-latitude ionosphere, (3) the perturbation of radio-wave propagation manifested by HF blackouts and increased GPS signal scintillation, and (4) the heating of the thermosphere, causing increased satellite drag. We discuss the reasons why the May 2003 storm is less intense than the October-November 2003 storms, although several indicators reach similar intensities.


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukitoshi Nishimura ◽  
Takashi Kikuchi ◽  
Yusuke Ebihara ◽  
Akimasa Yoshikawa ◽  
Shun Imajo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document