scholarly journals Relationship between drainage capacity and foundation settlement at Pre Rup Temple: Basic study on Khmer architecture drainage systems Part 1

Author(s):  
Yoko Kojima ◽  
Kousei Mikami ◽  
Hiroyoshi Shiokawa ◽  
Yutaka Shigeeda ◽  
Hiroki Agatsuma
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-622
Author(s):  
Yuxi Guan ◽  
Zheng Fang ◽  
Jianping Yuan ◽  
Zhi Tang

In high-rise and ultra-high-rise residential buildings, the drainage systems usually adopt the S-shaped offset pipe joint to avoid collisions of pipelines with beams and columns. However, the flow direction changes at the offset point would significantly affect the drainage capacity of the systems. To better understand the influence of pipe offset joints on the drainage capacity, three different building drainage systems namely YZW 1, YZW 2, and YZW 3 systems, were built up and investigated. YZW 1 system is a standard double-stack drainage system with anti-reflux H-tube joints. YZW 2 and YZW 3 systems were developed from YZW 1 by adding S-shape offset pipe joints on the 4th floor. An extra anti-reflux H-tube joint added 1 m above the offset joint as a measure for improving the drainage capacity differentiates YZW 3 system from YZW 2 system. The pressure fluctuation and water seal losses were adopted as experimental parameters to determine the maximum discharge capacity according to Standard for Capacity Test of Vertical Pipe of the Domestic Residential Drainage System. The experimental results show that the discharge capacity limitation of the drainage system with the offset joint is 6.5 L/s, which is much smaller than 11.0 L/s of the system without the offset joint. In the experiments with the offset joint, the pressure fluctuated fiercely at the position where flow direction changed and caused severe water seal losses of the floor drain and P-shaped trap. An anti-reflux H-tube joint above the original offset joint was observed to relieve the pressure fluctuation as an improvement and the drainage capacity was improved to some extent. The relationships among the maximum discharge rate, pressure fluctuation transients, and water seal losses were discussed. Lastly, a nondimensional analysis was adopted to understand the relationship between water seal losses and pressure limit values under different discharge rates for current test facilities. Practical application: A method has been tested and approved to effectively improve the discharge ability of a building drainage system that includes offset. The application of S-shape-offsets in high-rise building drainage systems can relieve the discharge congestion typically caused by standard pipe offset arrangements.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Oswaldo Palma Lopes Sobrinho ◽  
Stephanie Soares Arriero ◽  
Gerlange Soares da Silva ◽  
Aline Bezerra de Sousa ◽  
Álvaro Itaúna Schalcher Pereira

The hydraulic conductivity of a soil is the main parameter that determines its drainage capacity. However, its determination is of great importance for sizing in agricultural drainage systems. To determine the hydraulic conductivity of the soil in the presence of water table through the Auger-Hole. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Manioc and Fruticulture (EMBRAPA), located in the municipality of Cruz das Almas-BA. In order to estimate the hydraulic conductivity, several empirical formulas have been proposed, such as Ernst's, which is the model that most closely approximates the soil situation studied. The hydraulic conductivity values for the studied soil obtained by the Auger-Hole method ranged from 0.24821 to 0.28544 m day-1. With an average value for hydraulic conductivity of 0.266835 m day-¹, being considered slow. The soil under analysis is classified in slow saturated hydraulic conductivity. The Auger-Hole method proved to be practical, fast, safe and easy to handle.


2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (760) ◽  
pp. 1451-1461
Author(s):  
Yoko KOJIMA ◽  
Kousei MIKAMI ◽  
Hiroyoshi SHIOKAWA ◽  
Yutaka SHIGEEDA ◽  
Hiroki AGATSUMA

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (10) ◽  
pp. 1429-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Takahashi ◽  
Yoichi Kageyama ◽  
Atsushi Momose ◽  
Masaki Ishii ◽  
Makoto Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru Kumagai ◽  
Kenichi Tamura ◽  
Junichi Tsuchiya ◽  
Keiichiro Yasuda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document