Prereferral Intervention

Author(s):  
Jan N. Hughes
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan S. Bennett ◽  
William P. Erchul ◽  
Hannah L. Young ◽  
Chelsea M. Bartel

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia M. Castro ◽  
Kimberly A. Wiechmann ◽  
Kristen A. Capaccioli ◽  
Lyndsey R. Markley ◽  
Gerogette P. Yetter

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan S. Bennett ◽  
William P. Erchul ◽  
Hannah L. Young ◽  
Chelsea M. Bartel

1989 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L. Graden

The article by Pugach and Johnson raises some important points relative to assumptions of prereferral intervention approaches, including the importance of full participation and ownership by classroom teachers. At the same time, their arguments are flawed by a misunderstanding of some of the conceptual underpinnings of prereferral, intervention. These concepts, such as intervention assistance and “alternative” intervention, actually are founded in collaborative consultation. Intervention assistance approaches will be most effective when special and general educators work together, not to the exclusion of either group.


2003 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn H. Buck ◽  
Edward A. Polloway ◽  
Amy Smith-Thomas ◽  
Kelly Wilcox Cook

Without a federal mandate providing clear guidelines for specific practices, prereferral intervention practices are implemented in varied ways within and between the states. The current study focused on practices across all states as a replication of the research reported in 1989 by Carter and Sugai. Significant findings included the status of prereferral practices within the respective states, the pattern of terminology used, the professional ownership of the process, and the patterns of participation. The results are discussed in terms of changes noted since the Carter and Sugai research, apparent trends in the field, and directions for effective professional practice.


1989 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Carter ◽  
George Sugai

A six-item survey was sent to state directors of special education (or their equivalent) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Items were developed to assess the type and level of prereferral intervention usage reported by state level special education administrators. Despite a lack of empirical support and a relatively inconclusive success rate, many state level administrators reported that they require or recommend the use of prereferral intervention strategies.


2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Truscott ◽  
Celina E. Cohen ◽  
Deanna P. Sams ◽  
Kathryn J. Sanborn ◽  
Alicia J. Frank

1992 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul T. Sindelar ◽  
Cynthia C. Griffin ◽  
Stephen W. Smith ◽  
Addison K. Watanabe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document