The Entanglement of Energy, Grand Strategy, and International Security

Author(s):  
Meghan L. O'Sullivan
2001 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. 835-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avery Goldstein

A clearer consensus on China's basic foreign policy line began to emerge among party leaders in 1996. This consensus, tantamount to the country's grand strategy, has provided a relatively coherent framework for China's subsequent international behavior and the expected contribution of diplomacy to the country's security. Concerned about the adverse international reaction to its expanding, yet still limited, power, Beijing has forged a diplomatic strategy with two broad purposes: (1) to maintain the international conditions that will make it feasible for China to focus on the domestic development necessary if it is to increase its relative (and not just absolute) capabilities; and (2) to reduce the likelihood that the U.S. or others with its backing will exploit their current material advantage to abort China's ascent. These considerations have resulted in efforts to reassure potential adversaries who had grown increasingly worried about China's rise and also efforts to encourage the world's major powers to view China as an indispensable, or at least attractive, international partner. The author examines the principal reasons for adopting this diplomatic strategy, describes its key elements, and considers its durability and implications for international security in the coming decades.


2020 ◽  
pp. 193-227
Author(s):  
Bleddyn E. Bowen

Chapter 5 theorises the ubiquitous dispersing effects of spacepower upon Earth, which continues a longer-term trend in military capabilities. It is through exploiting and challenging the dispersing power from commanding this coastline of Earth orbit that we can integrate the real consequences of spacepower into thinking on grand strategy and international security on Earth itself. Satellite constellations are dispersed and enable the dispersion of networked terrestrial military units without losing cohesion or combat power when coupled with precision-strike weapons. This also imposes dispersion on enemy forces and changes the terms under which concentration can still be achieved in conventional warfare in the 21st century.


2006 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Lucian W. Pye ◽  
Avery Goldstein

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Paul Kapur ◽  
Sumit Ganguly

Islamist militants based in Pakistan pose a major threat to regional and international security. Although this problem has only recently received widespread attention, Pakistan has long used militants as strategic tools to compensate for its severe political and material weakness. This use of Islamist militancy has constituted nothing less than a central component of Pakistani grand strategy; supporting jihad has been one of the principal means by which the Pakistani state has sought to produce security for itself. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, the strategy has not been wholly disastrous. Rather, it has achieved important domestic and international successes. Recently, however, Pakistan has begun to suffer from a “jihad paradox”: the very conditions that previously made Pakistan's militant policy useful now make it extremely dangerous. Thus, despite its past benefits, the strategy has outlived its utility, and Pakistan will have to abandon it to avoid catastrophe. Other weak states, which may also be tempted to use nonstate actors as strategic tools, should take the Pakistani case as a cautionary lesson.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document