The Gallic Wars, 61-51 BC

Author(s):  
Louis Rawlings
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Siniša Bilić-Dujmušić ◽  
Feđa Milivojević

This article is dealing with the chronology and subject of Caesar’s first visit to Illyricum. Namely, at the beginning of winter in 57 B.C. Gaius Julius Caesar, the governor of Illyricum and the two Gauls, set off to Illyricum with the intent to visit the local communities and to acquaint himself with the area. However, in Gaul suddenly broke out the rebellion of the Veneti and their allies. Caesar’s subordinate  commander in the area, Publius Licinius Crassus, informed Caesar about these  events. As he was quite distant, Caesar ordered military ships to be built on the  river that flows in the Atlantic Ocean (Liger fl.) and told Crassus he will proceed  to the army cum primum per anni tempus potuit. This seemingly short episode during Caesar’s governorship of Illyricum is attested with only a few words in the third  book of Commentarii de Bello Gallico (bell. Gall. III, VII – IX). Although noticed  in modern historiography, to date no significant scholarly attention or satisfactory  analysis has been paid to it. In modern historiography it is mentioned exclusively  in the works dealing with a far wider context. There is only an overview, with a prevailing opinion that due to the war with the Veneti Caesar had to adjourn his  short visit to Illyricum or that he did not even arrive there. Yet with the analysis  of general historical circumstances, specific chronology of the period and Caesar’s  work on Gallic wars, an exactly different conclusion is to be made. Here the authors  give new interpretation of Caesar’s words and contemporary information on the  political events in Rome. Thus proving not only that Caesar’s departure to war with  the Veneti cannot be chronologically associated with his departure to Illyricum, but  that Caesar indeed visited Illyricum; that his visit lasted much longer than it has  been considered so far; and that his reasons for the visit stemmed from the significance of the province in Caesar’s plans for future engagements.


Author(s):  
Max Cary ◽  
John Frederick Drinkwater
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Gilliver
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-200
Author(s):  
John North

Abstract In the course of his famous account of the Gallic Wars, Julius Caesar breaks off and digresses for a few chapters (6.11−28) on the religious customs of the Gauls and the Germans. This paper argues that, while there may not be too much to be learned from the digression about its ostensible subjects, it gives us a unique opportunity to assess whether Caesar had a conception of a ‘religion’ as such, of an area of religious activities and ideas within different societies, which would have enabled him to write a comparison between Roman religious life, about which as pontifex maximus he knew a good deal, and those of these other societies about which he knew at least a little. The conclusion is that he has no such conception; that his account allows no sharp distinction between the religious and non-religious areas of Gallic, German or Roman life. Rather he reveals an evolutionary perspective in which the superiority of Rome over the Gauls, and of Gauls over Germans, provide the central message he succeeds, consciously or not, in conveying.


Colossus ◽  
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Singh

In Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars, he describes how he sent a message to the besieged Cicero. The messsage was encrypted by substituting Greek letters for Roman letters, then delivered in the most dramatic way imaginable. The messenger, unable to reach the camp, hurled a spear with the letter fastened to it with a thong. Although the spear lodged itself in a tower, nobody spotted it for two days. Eventually, it was taken down and delivered to Cicero, who read out the vital news to the entire camp, bringing enormous joy to his troops. This was the first documented use of a substitution cipher for military purposes. Substitution ciphers, as the name suggests, encrypt messages by replacing the original characters with different characters. This is in contrast to a transposition cipher, in which the characters remain the same, but they are transposed or rearranged to create an anagram. One of the most famous substitution ciphers is the so-called Caesar cipher, which simply replaces each letter in the message with the letter that is, say, three places further down the alphabet. Cryptographers often think in terms of the plain alphabet, the alphabet used to write the original message, and the cipher alphabet, the letters that are substituted in place of the plain letters, both of which are shown below. The plaintext is the technical name for the original message, while the ciphertext is the encrypted message. In this chapter, the plaintext is written in lower case and the ciphertext in upper case. Although this example involves a shift of 3, lesser or greater shifts are of course possible. The Caesar cipher can be generally stated as substituting each plain letter with the letter that is x places later in the alphabet, where x is between 1 and 25. This illustrates one of the basic principles of cryptography, namely the relationship between the algorithm and the key. In the Caesar cipher, the algorithm is the general idea of replacing the original letters with those that lie a fixed number of places further along the alphabet. The key, x, specifies the distance of the shift.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document