Criminal Forensic Evaluations in Germany

2020 ◽  
pp. 295-304
Author(s):  
Henning Saß ◽  
Hans‐Ludwig Kröber ◽  
Alan R. Felthous
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Evaluations

How Reliable Are Forensic Evaluations? Evaluator Agreement in Sanity Evaluations

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Gowensmith ◽  
Daniel C. Murrie ◽  
Marcus T. Boccaccini
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Evaluations

Application of the Sads Diagnostic Interview to Forensic Psychiatry

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Rogers ◽  
James L. Cavanaugh
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Psychiatry ◽  
Affective Disorders ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Significant Advance ◽  
Forensic Evaluations ◽  
Legal Questions ◽  
Fitness To Stand Trial ◽  
Structured Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Forensic Setting

The Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS), a sophisticated, semi-structured diagnostic interview, is introduced as a significant advance in forensic evaluations. Pertinent research on the SADS' development is summarized and its administration and use in the forensic setting are described in detail. Particular attention is focused on evaluations involving legal questions of sanity, fitness to stand trial, and treatability in delineating the clinical strengths and limitations of the SADS diagnostic interview.

Third Party Presence During Criminal Forensic Evaluations: Psychologist Survey

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton Shealy ◽  
Robert J. Cramer ◽  
Gianni Pirelli
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
Forensic Evaluations

Forensic Consultation

2011 ◽  
pp. 92-106
Author(s):  
Ira K. Packer ◽  
Thomas Grisso
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Evaluations ◽  
Forensic Psychologists

This chapter begins with a discussion of standards for providing written reports of forensic evaluations. It then discusses the competencies involved when forensic psychologists function as formal consultants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document