Nasoalveolar Molding and Long-Term Postsurgical Esthetics for Unilateral Cleft Lip/Palate

Author(s):  
Pravinkumar G. Patil ◽  
Smita P. Patil ◽  
Soumil Sarin
2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 935-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Liang ◽  
Jinfeng Yao ◽  
Philip K.T. Chen ◽  
Cangshang Zheng ◽  
Jiying Yang

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) on long-term nasal symmetry and shaping after primary cheiloplasty in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate (UCL/P). Design: This was a two-group, parallel, retrospective, randomized clinical trial. Setting: The setting for this study was the Chang Gung Craniofacial Center in Taoyuan, Taiwan. Patients: Patients were divided into one of the following two groups: infants with UCL/P who underwent PNAM (PNAM group, n = 42) and infants with UCL/P who did not undergo PNAM (non-PNAM group, n = 42). Interventions: Interventions included PNAM and primary cheiloplasty without nasal cartilage dissection. Main Outcome Measures: In this study, 4- to 5-year postoperative full-face and submental oblique photographs were taken of all patients and scored from 1 to 5 points by 10 medical evaluators. The scores were statistically analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, and P < .05 was considered to represent statistical significance. Results: After 1 to 3 months of PNAM but before primary cheiloplasty, the displaced nasal and alveolar cartilage showed obvious improvement. However, the scores in the PNAM and non-PNAM groups at 4 to 5 years postoperatively were 66.62 ± 14.25 and 66.31 ± 15.08, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( F = 0.009, P = .923). Conclusion: PNAM as an early-stage adjunctive therapy for nasal deformity correction is beneficial before primary cheiloplasty, but it is insufficient to maintain long-term nostril symmetry after primary cheiloplasty without nasal cartilage dissection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (01) ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Hoshal ◽  
Roberto N. Solis ◽  
Travis T. Tollefson

AbstractRhinoplasty for cleft lip nasal deformities challenges all cleft surgeons. There is great variability of phenotypical anatomy, but iatrogenic changes and scarring from the previous surgeries add another layer of complexity. Rhinoplasties on a patient with cleft lip–palate are technically and intellectually challenging to master requiring a patient-tailored approach. The shape and structure of the nose are changed to improve both function and aesthetic appearance. In the primary setting, nasoalveolar molding is a form of presurgical infant orthopaedics used for preparation before the cleft lip and nose repair. Intermediate stages should be conservative to minimize scarring, while the definitive cleft rhinoplasty utilizes cartilage grafts from septum, ear, or rib to sculpt the nose. Hereinto, we will outline the controversies, the evidence supporting certain techniques, and our preferences.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey L. Clark ◽  
John F. Teichgraeber ◽  
Ruth G. Fleshman ◽  
Joi D. Shaw ◽  
Carmen Chavarria ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-512
Author(s):  
Greg Essick ◽  
Ceib Phillips ◽  
Yunro Chung ◽  
Carroll-Ann Trotman

1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Gaggl ◽  
Günter Schultes ◽  
Hans Kärcher

Objective: To assess the aesthetic and functional long-term results of surgical and orthodontic treatment of patients with bilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus. Design: Long-term follow-up study. Setting: Teaching hospital in Austria. Patients: Twenty adult patients who had been operated on as children for bilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus. Interventions: Lateral cephalometric and model analysis. The sum of all mesiodistal tooth diameters in the maxilla and mandible were compared with standard Bolton tracings. Main outcome measures: Aesthetic and functional results. Results (model analysis): The upper arch was too wide in 12 patients and the mandibular arch was too wide in 4 patients. In 11 patients, the lateral teeth were crowded, and all had a persistent transverse space deficit and a reduction in sagittal measurements. Fifteen patients had alveolar midline displacement of the maxilla as well as of the mandible. Results (lateral cephalometric measurements): The lateral cephalograms showed a mean sella-nasion-A point angle of 77° and a maxillary baseline-nasion-sella line angle of 9°, indicating a tendency toward maxillary retrognathia. An anterior facial height index of 42% (compared with the standard 58%) indicated a slight reduction in midface height with consequent increase in the height of the lower face. Conclusion: There is specific growth impairment of the midface in adults who were treated as children for bilateral clefts of lip, palate, and alveolus. An optimal result can be achieved only by additional orthognathic surgery (Le Fort II osteotomy).


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 762-769
Author(s):  
Hanieh Hassani ◽  
Jung-Wei Chen ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
William Hamra

Purpose: The aim of the current study is as follows: (1) to study whether wearing the presurgical nasoalveolar molding appliance (PNAM) had facilitated the establishment of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus ( LB) and to determine other factors including pH and caries susceptibility associated with wearing the PNAM. Methods: Saliva samples of 61 infants (4.5 ± 2.06 months old) were collected from the following 3 groups: PNAM (n = 23), healthy (n = 30), and cleft lip and palate (CLP) without any treatment (n = 8). Saliva samples were assessed using selective agar to enumerate total LB and S mutans and subjected to adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-driven bioluminescence determinations using a luciferin-based assay system, and pH level was evaluated. One-way analysis of variance with least significant difference post hoc test ( P < .05) and Pearson correlation were used to evaluate S mutans, LB, pH, and ATP levels. Results: A total of 63 patients (30 healthy patients, 23 patients with cleft lip/palate who had PNAM appliance and 8 patients with cleft lip/palate who did not use the appliance) were seen in this study. There is a significant difference in pH ( P = .012), LB Caries Risk Test ( P < .001), LB colony count ( P < .001), S mutans Caries Risk Test ( P < .001), and S mutans colony count ( P < .001) among the 3 groups (PNAM > CLP > healthy). The ATP level was not significantly different among the 3 groups. Conclusion: Higher bacterial count and lower pH were found in the PNAM group. Cleft lip and/or palate patients wearing the PNAM appliance are at higher risk for dental caries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document