5G Network Slicing for V2X Communications: Technologies and Enablers

Author(s):  
Claudia Campolo ◽  
Antonella Molinaro ◽  
Vincenzo Sciancalepore
Author(s):  
Rastin Pries ◽  
Hans-Jochen Morper ◽  
Nandor Galambosi ◽  
Michael Jarschel
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol E100.B (11) ◽  
pp. 1992-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim AFOLABI ◽  
Adlen KSENTINI ◽  
Miloud BAGAA ◽  
Tarik TALEB ◽  
Marius CORICI ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bin Han ◽  
Antonio DeDomenico ◽  
Ghina Dandachi ◽  
Anastasios Drosou ◽  
Dimitrios Tzovaras ◽  
...  

Telecom IT ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-29
Author(s):  
B. Goldstein ◽  
V. Elagin ◽  
K. Kobzev ◽  
A. Grebenshchikova

Communications Service Providers are looking to 5G technology as an enabler for new revenues, with network slicing providing a cost-effective means of supporting multiple services on shared infrastructure. Different radio access technologies, network architectures, and core functions can be brought together under software control to deliver appropriate Quality of Service “slices,” enabling new levels of service innovation, such as high bandwidth for video applications, low latency for automation, and mass connectivity for Smart Cities.


Author(s):  
Phudit Ampririt ◽  
Ermioni Qafzezi ◽  
Kevin Bylykbashi ◽  
Makoto Ikeda ◽  
Keita Matsuo ◽  
...  

The fifth generation (5G) network is expected to be flexible to satisfy quality of service (QoS) requirements, and the software-defined network (SDN) with network slicing will be a good approach for admission control. In this paper, the authors present and compare two fuzzy-based schemes to evaluate the QoS (FSQoS). They call these schemes FSQoS1 and FSQoS2. The FSQoS1 considers three parameters: slice throughput (ST), slice delay (SD), and slice loss (SL). In FSQoS2, they consider as an additional parameter the slice reliability (SR). So, FSQoS2 has four input parameters. They carried out simulations for evaluating the performance of the proposed schemes. From simulation results, they conclude that the considered parameters have different effects on the QoS performance. The FSQoS2 is more complex than FSQoS1, but it has a better performance for evaluating QoS. When ST and SR are increasing, the QoS parameter is increased. But, when SD and SL are increasing, the QoS is decreased. When ST is 0.1, SD is 0.1, SL is 0.1, and the QoS is increased by 32.02% when SR is increased from 0.3 to 0.8.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document