Auditory Distraction by Meaningless Irrelevant Speech: A Developmental Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bozana Meinhardt-Injac ◽  
Sabine Schlittmeier ◽  
Maria Klatte ◽  
Annette Otto ◽  
Malte Persike ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Brittan A. Barker ◽  
Emily M. Elliott

Abstract. The current research employed a classic irrelevant sound effect paradigm and investigated the talker-specific content of the irrelevant speech. Specifically, we aimed to determine if the participants’ familiarity with the irrelevant speech’s talker affected the magnitude of the irrelevant sound effect. Experiment 1 was an exploration of talker familiarity established in a natural listening environment (i.e., a university classroom) in which we manipulated the participants’ relationships with the talker. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the participants’ familiarity with the talker via 4 days of controlled exposure to the target talker’s audio recordings. For both Experiments 1 and 2, a robust effect of irrelevant speech was found; however, regardless of the talker manipulation, talker familiarity did not influence the size of the effect. We interpreted the results within the processing view of the auditory distraction effect and highlighted the notion that talker familiarity may be more vulnerable than once thought.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittan Ann Barker ◽  
Emily M. Elliott

The current research employed a classic irrelevant sound effect paradigm and investigated the talker-specific content of the irrelevant speech. Specifically, we aimed to determine if the participants’ familiarity with the irrelevant speech’s talker affected the magnitude of the irrelevant sound effect. Experiment 1was an exploration of talker familiarity established in a natural listening environment(i.e. a university classroom)in which we manipulated the participants’ relationships with the talker. In Experiment 2 we manipulated the participants’ familiarity with the talker via 4 days of controlled exposure to the target talker’s audio recordings. For both Experiments1 and 2, a robust effect of irrelevant speech was found; however, regardless of the talker manipulation, talker familiarity did not influence the size of the effect. We interpreted the results within the processing view of the auditory distraction effect and highlighted the notion that talker familiarity may be more vulnerable than once thought.


1968 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 825-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn M. Corlew

Two experiments investigated the information conveyed by intonation from speaker to listener. A multiple-choice test was devised to test the ability of 48 adults to recognize and label intonation when it was separated from all other meaning. Nine intonation contours whose labels were most agreed upon by adults were each matched with two English sentences (one with appropriate and one with inappropriate intonation and semantic content) to make a matching-test for children. The matching-test was tape-recorded and given to children in the first, third, and fifth grades (32 subjects in each grade). The first-grade children matched the intonations with significantly greater agreement than chance; but they agreed upon significantly fewer sentences than either the third or fifth graders. Some intonation contours were matched with significantly greater frequency than others. The performance of the girls was better than that of the boys on an impatient question and a simple command which indicates that there was a significant interaction between sex and intonation.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale ◽  
◽  
Ronald Angel ◽  
Linda Burton ◽  
Andrew Cherlin ◽  
...  

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Koslin ◽  
Bertram Koslin ◽  
Richard Paragament ◽  
Henry Bird

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document