scholarly journals Outcomes of patients with large B‐cell lymphomas and progressive disease following CD19‐specific CAR T‐cell therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor A. Chow ◽  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
David G. Maloney ◽  
Cameron J. Turtle ◽  
Stephen D. Smith ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072090289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Riedell ◽  
Michael R. Bishop

Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas represent a diverse population of diseases that are typically treated with anti-CD20 based immunochemotherapy. While this treatment is effective for a large proportion of patients, those that become refractory to induction therapy or experience disease relapse suffer an inferior overall prognosis, and novel treatment options are needed. Adoptive T-cell immunotherapy in the form of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is one of the most revolutionary breakthroughs in the past several decades for the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphomas. Based on data from the pivotal ZUMA-1 study, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) became the first-in-class anti-CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy approved for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and other aggressive B-cell lymphoma variants. In this review, we provide an overview of CAR T-cell therapy, including its biology, manufacturing, and treatment course. In addition, we highlight the available efficacy data, review pertinent safety concerns, including cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity, as well as provide an overview of emerging therapeutic strategies in the cellular therapy arena.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 137-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Chong ◽  
J. Svoboda ◽  
S.D. Nasta ◽  
D.J. Landsburg ◽  
N. Winchell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 384 (7) ◽  
pp. 673-674
Author(s):  
Elise A. Chong ◽  
Marco Ruella ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise A Chong ◽  
Cécile Alanio ◽  
Jakub Svoboda ◽  
Sunita D Nasta ◽  
Daniel J Landsburg ◽  
...  

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR T cells) achieve durable remissions in about 30-40% of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas. T cell exhaustion and/or an immunosuppressive tumor-microenvironment may contribute to CAR T-cell failure. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, may reverse T-cell exhaustion following CAR T-cell therapy. We treated 12 patients with B-cell lymphomas who were either refractory to (N=9) or relapsed after (N=3) CD19-directed CAR T cell (4-1BB-costimulated) therapy with pembrolizumab 200mg IV every 3 weeks. Median time from CAR T-cell infusion to first pembrolizumab dose was 3.3 months (range: 0.4-42.8 months). Pembrolizumab was well-tolerated and the only ≥ grade 3 adverse events related to pembrolizumab were neutropenia (N=3; 25%). Best overall response rate after pembrolizumab was 3/12 (25%) [1 complete response; 2 partial responses]. One (8%) patient had stable disease, thus, 4/12 (33%) patients had clinical benefit. After pembrolizumab, 4 patients with clinical benefit had increase in percentage of CAR T cells by mass cytometry (CyTOF); 3 of 4 of these patients also had increases in CAR19 transgene levels by qPCR. Deep immune profiling using mass cytometry revealed increased CAR T cell activation and proliferation and less T-cell exhaustion in clinical responders. Together, PD1 blockade with pembrolizumab after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy appears safe and may achieve clinical responses in some patients with B-cell lymphomas refractory to or relapsed after CAR T-cell therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (13) ◽  
pp. 2707-2716
Author(s):  
Nora Liebers ◽  
Johannes Duell ◽  
Donnacha Fitzgerald ◽  
Andrea Kerkhoff ◽  
Daniel Noerenberg ◽  
...  

The antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin (pola) has recently been approved in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (pola-BR) for patients with refractory or relapsed (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). To investigate the efficacy of pola-BR in a real-world setting, we retrospectively analyzed 105 patients with LBCL who were treated in 26 German centers under the national compassionate use program. Fifty-four patients received pola as a salvage treatment and 51 patients were treated with pola with the intention to bridge to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (n = 41) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n = 10). Notably, patients in the salvage and bridging cohort had received a median of 3 prior treatment lines. In the salvage cohort, the best overall response rate was 48.1%. The 6-month progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was 27.7% and 49.6%, respectively. In the bridging cohort, 51.2% of patients could be successfully bridged with pola to the intended CAR T-cell therapy. The combination of pola bridging and successful CAR T-cell therapy resulted in a 6-month OS of 77.9% calculated from pola initiation. Pola vedotin-rituximab without a chemotherapy backbone demonstrated encouraging overall response rates up to 40%, highlighting both an appropriate alternative for patients unsuitable for chemotherapy and a new treatment option for bridging before leukapheresis in patients intended for CAR T-cell therapy. Furthermore, 7 of 12 patients with previous failure of CAR T-cell therapy responded to a pola-containing regimen. These findings suggest that pola may serve as effective salvage and bridging treatment of r/r LBCL patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Kelly N. Fitzgerald ◽  
Andres E. Quesada ◽  
Gottfried von Keudell ◽  
Sandeep Raj ◽  
Natasha E. Lewis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (19) ◽  
pp. 4869-4872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor A. Chow ◽  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Yolanda D. Tseng ◽  
Cameron J. Turtle ◽  
...  

Key Points No meaningful responses were observed when axicabtagene ciloleucel was used for progression after a different CD19-directed CAR T cell. Further research is needed to understand how to sequence cell-based therapies for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 94-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor A. Chow ◽  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
David G. Maloney ◽  
Cameron J. Turtle ◽  
Stephen D. Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has proven to be highly effective in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas, yielding early complete response (CR) rates of ~40%, which are typically sustained. Unfortunately, most patients will not experience prolonged disease control. Despite this fact, little data exist defining the outcomes and impact of subsequent therapies for such individuals. Limited data also exist on the ability for such patients to pursue further clinical trials or allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT). This project details the specific interventions and outcomes of this population to better inform the management of patients who suffer progressive disease (PD) after CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy. METHODS: Adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCL) who received CD19-specific CAR T-cells at the University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance were included in this analysis. Patients who received CAR T-cell therapy in conjunction with additional protocol-specified therapy were excluded. Those who exhibited PD or persistent lymphoma after CAR T-cell therapy were the focus of this study. We defined initial PD as patients who had evidence of disease progression on the initial response assessment. Delayed PD was defined as achieving a CR, partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) on the initial response assessment, but eventually progressed or received subsequent anti-lymphoma therapy. Baseline characteristics and all data were retrieved from the electronic medical record up until date of death or date of last contact in our system, including subsequent interventions and outcomes. Primary endpoint of this analysis was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between October 2013 and May 2018, we identified 51 patients with PD following CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy. Baseline characteristics are listed in the Table 1. Histologies included DLBCL (29), HGBCL (11), tFL (8) and PMBCL (3). Median age was 60 years (range 26-75), 65% were male, median prior regimens was 3 (range 1-8). Median time from CAR T infusion to PD was 42 days (range 11-609), with 27 (53%) patients exhibiting initial PD. Median follow up after time of progression was 4.2 months. Initial PD was associated with a higher risk of death (HR 2.376, 95% CI 1.19-4.75, p=0.0143, Figure 1). The median OS for those with initial PD and delayed PD was 5.1 months (95% CI 2.0-9.3) and 13.6 months (4.1-not reached) respectively. 39 (76%) patients received ≥ 1 subsequent therapies after PD. Initial therapies included: 2nd CAR T infusion (14), targeted therapy (10), chemotherapy +/- rituximab (7), other immunotherapy (3), radiotherapy (3), intrathecal chemotherapy (1) and allogeneic HSCT (1). 12 (24%) patients received no further therapy despite PD. Those who received ≥ 1 subsequent therapies after PD had a lower risk of death (HR 0.344, 95% CI 0.149-0.793, P=0.0122) compared to those who did not. There was no difference in survival if 2nd CAR T infusion was the next line therapy compared to others (p=0.449), targeted therapy compared to others (p=0.417), or chemotherapy compared to others (p=0.565). 5 (10%) patients enrolled onto a clinical trial as next line therapy. 4 (8%) patients eventually received an allogeneic HSCT after PD, 2 of whom are still alive. We identified 8 patients who were alive for ≥ 12 months after progression without evidence of lymphoma. Last line of therapy for these patients included allogeneic HSCT (2), subsequent CD19-specific CAR-T cell infusion (2), ibrutinib (2), lenalidomide/rituximab (1), and radiotherapy (1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PD post anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, particularly those exhibiting initial PD, have poor long-term outcomes. Patients receiving at least one anti-lymphoma therapy after PD had improved overall survival, although no single approach appeared to confer a survival benefit. Few enrolled onto a clinical trial or received an allogeneic HSCT. These data reinforce the need to both further improve the durable CR rate after CAR T-cell therapy and to develop effective strategies for those not achieving a CR. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Spectrum: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Brim: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Asana: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding. Maloney:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Turtle:Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics / Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Smith:Genentech: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma BV: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Shadman:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Cassaday:Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Till:Mustang Bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Shustov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Acharya:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria. Lynch:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; T.G. Therapeutics: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Research Funding; Johnson Graffe Keay Moniz & Wick LLP: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio C. Chavez ◽  
Frederick L. Locke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document