An alternative management approach to paranasal sinus fibro-osseous lesions

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eng H. Ooi ◽  
Jordan T. Glicksman ◽  
Allan D. Vescan ◽  
Ian J. Witterick
2020 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Tadeu Fuess ◽  
Graciete Mary dos Santos ◽  
Tiago Palladino Delforno ◽  
Bruna de Souza Moraes ◽  
Ariovaldo José da Silva

Marine Policy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Johnston ◽  
Daniel S. Holland ◽  
Vishwanie Maharaj ◽  
Tammy Warner Campson

2014 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. S142
Author(s):  
Mehmet Emin Kalkan ◽  
Mustafa Akçakoyun ◽  
Serdar Demir ◽  
Elnur Alizade ◽  
Göksel Açar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Cubero-Cardoso ◽  
Antonio Serrano ◽  
Ángeles Trujillo-Reyes ◽  
Denys K. Villa-Gómez ◽  
Rafael Borja ◽  
...  

This review summarizes and critically analyzes the different types of potential valorization options for strawberry extrudate in order to have a broader overview of the potential management of this waste. Animal feed is commonly used as a management option for the strawberry extrudate; however, most of the strawberry extrudate is disposed in landfills. Strawberry extrudate contains different bioactive compounds that encourage the use of an alternative management approach than landfilled. The present review offers a complete comparative, including the advantages and drawbacks of each reviewed technique, to facilitate the selection of the most suitable technology for the different valorization scenarios. This review has been structured in three sections: 1. Composition of the strawberry extrudate and strawberry especially focused on their content in bioactive compounds. 2. The different techniques of extraction and purification of bioactive compounds. 3. The handling and management of the resulting biomass after the extraction process of bioactive compounds.


2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S2) ◽  
pp. S111-S118 ◽  
Author(s):  
V J Lund ◽  
P M Clarke ◽  
A C Swift ◽  
G W McGarry ◽  
C Kerawala ◽  
...  

AbstractThis is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. With only limited high-level evidence for management of nasal and paranasal sinus cancers owing to low incidence and diverse histology, this paper provides recommendations on the work up and management based on the existing evidence base.Recommendations• Sinonasal tumours are best treatedde novoand unusual polyps should be imaged and biopsied prior to definitive surgery. (G)• Treatment of sinonasal malignancy should be carefully planned and discussed at a specialist skull base multidisciplinary team meeting with all relevant expertise. (G)• Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for inverted papilloma and juvenile angiofibroma. (R)• Essential equipment is necessary and must be available prior to commencing endonasal resection of skull base malignancy. (G)• Endoscopic skull base surgery may be facilitated by two surgeons working simultaneously, utilising both sides of the nose. (G)• To ensure the optimum oncological results, the primary tumour must be completely removed and margins checked by frozen section if necessary. (G)• The most common management approach is surgery followed by post-operative radiotherapy, ideally within six weeks. (R)• Radiation is given first if a response to radiation may lead to organ preservation. (G)• Radiotherapy should be delivered within an accredited department using megavoltage photons from a linear accelerator (typical energies 4–6 MV) as an unbroken course. (R)


Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xenophon Kochilas ◽  
Thomas Nikolopoulos ◽  
Theodora Nasiopoulou ◽  
Aikaterini Kiprouli ◽  
Michael Androulakis ◽  
...  

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Farhadi ◽  
Shabahang Mohammadi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document