scholarly journals Arthritis in the family practice setting: Associations with education and community poverty

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 1002-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh F. Callahan ◽  
Jack Shreffler ◽  
Thelma Mielenz ◽  
Britta Schoster ◽  
Jay S. Kaufman ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Yaman ◽  
Erdinç Yavuz ◽  
Adem Er ◽  
Ramazan Vural ◽  
Yalçin Albayrak ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 10-18
Author(s):  
Madelyn H. Fernstrom

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sloan Manning ◽  
Radwan F. Haykal ◽  
Hagop S. Akiskal

1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Waickus ◽  
A. de Bustros ◽  
A. Shakil

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis ◽  
Dirk Wijkel ◽  
Peter F. M. Verhaak ◽  
Dorine H. Collijn ◽  
Frits J. Huyse ◽  
...  

Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility of a psychiatric consultation intervention for somatizing patients in the family practice setting in terms of 1) patient compliance, 2) patient satisfaction, and 3) compliance and satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs). Method: In a period of nine months, forty-six patients were selected for psychiatric consultation in six solo family practices in a semi-urban area in the Netherlands. The consultation included an interview with the consulting psychiatrist, the patient, and the GP. A written summary of the consultation was provided to the GP and the patient. A booster session with a GP and psychiatrist was included to evaluate and reinforce the recommendations. Results: The majority of the selected patients agreed to participate after informed consent. An intervention was implemented containing interpersonal techniques, reattribution, clarification, and structuring. GP compliance with recommendations was 100 percent, patient compliance 75 percent. Conclusion: A standardized psychiatric consultation for somatizing patients in a family practice setting can be implemented. Several levels of implementation can be distinguished.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Zuber ◽  
Kathryn Kolasa ◽  
James G. Jones

Author(s):  
Brendan O Shea

The theme of this chapter explores aspects of professional blindness in the family practice setting. The exploration uses the vehicle of an exercise in practice audit, which resulted in a more meaningful level of interaction between the GP and a particular group of individuals in his practice. What set out as a quantitative exercise in audit inadvertently threw up valuable qualitative insights and reflections on how this family doctor had previously viewed this group of individuals in the past, and more importantly, would do so in the future. In particular, the exercise challenges us to look for and see the ambitions and hopes of those individuals who attend us for medical care, in order to properly respect these important aspects of their humanity, and to assist us in more easily rising beyond the confines unwittingly imposed and accepted by a passive acceptance of disease defined horizons and the medical model. The audit outcomes include improved levels of achievement in the relevant markers of good care, easily and unremarkably measurable in the standard manner. A key outcome, rather more difficult to measure, included an increased respect and recognition of the difficulties, efforts, challenges, fears, hopes and varied realities experienced by this most particular group of eclectically selected individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document