Smaller Heroes I Didn’t See

Author(s):  
Brendan O Shea

The theme of this chapter explores aspects of professional blindness in the family practice setting. The exploration uses the vehicle of an exercise in practice audit, which resulted in a more meaningful level of interaction between the GP and a particular group of individuals in his practice. What set out as a quantitative exercise in audit inadvertently threw up valuable qualitative insights and reflections on how this family doctor had previously viewed this group of individuals in the past, and more importantly, would do so in the future. In particular, the exercise challenges us to look for and see the ambitions and hopes of those individuals who attend us for medical care, in order to properly respect these important aspects of their humanity, and to assist us in more easily rising beyond the confines unwittingly imposed and accepted by a passive acceptance of disease defined horizons and the medical model. The audit outcomes include improved levels of achievement in the relevant markers of good care, easily and unremarkably measurable in the standard manner. A key outcome, rather more difficult to measure, included an increased respect and recognition of the difficulties, efforts, challenges, fears, hopes and varied realities experienced by this most particular group of eclectically selected individuals.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 823-823
Author(s):  
Ross G. MITCHELL

The medical care of children in Great Britain is largely in the hands of the family doctor. A monograph on symptoms in childhood as encountered in family practice could therefore be of great value. Dr. Fry has tried to produce such a volume but unfortunately falls short of his aim, for his book unhappily combines a synopsis of rare diseases, inappropriate in a book of this kind, with a rather more useful treatise on diagnosis. It imparts some sound advice but contains much unnecessary and misleading detail. In its emphasis, the book has a curiously old-fashioned flavor, in spite of interpolated fragments of information on "recent advances." Neither in tone nor in matter does it reflect the thinking and practice of British pediatricians.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Yaman ◽  
Erdinç Yavuz ◽  
Adem Er ◽  
Ramazan Vural ◽  
Yalçin Albayrak ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 10-18
Author(s):  
Madelyn H. Fernstrom

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M.W. Hackett ◽  
Lionel D. Jacobson

The paper reports the development of a 17 item questionnaire to measure the approachability of family practice consultations. Approachability is selectively taken to be a function of the ability to make an appointment and as a perception of whether the family doctor is open and approachable. One hundred and six users of family practice services, were approached on an opportunity basis and completed the questionnaire. Factor analysis and reliability analysis demonstrated the instrument to be structured by three significant factors. The factors were labelled ‘the doctor’, ‘the consultation environment’ and ‘emotions’. The questionnaire is subject to further development to allow its wider use to gauge the effects of individual consultations on patients.


1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sloan Manning ◽  
Radwan F. Haykal ◽  
Hagop S. Akiskal

1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Waickus ◽  
A. de Bustros ◽  
A. Shakil

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 1002-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh F. Callahan ◽  
Jack Shreffler ◽  
Thelma Mielenz ◽  
Britta Schoster ◽  
Jay S. Kaufman ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis ◽  
Dirk Wijkel ◽  
Peter F. M. Verhaak ◽  
Dorine H. Collijn ◽  
Frits J. Huyse ◽  
...  

Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility of a psychiatric consultation intervention for somatizing patients in the family practice setting in terms of 1) patient compliance, 2) patient satisfaction, and 3) compliance and satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs). Method: In a period of nine months, forty-six patients were selected for psychiatric consultation in six solo family practices in a semi-urban area in the Netherlands. The consultation included an interview with the consulting psychiatrist, the patient, and the GP. A written summary of the consultation was provided to the GP and the patient. A booster session with a GP and psychiatrist was included to evaluate and reinforce the recommendations. Results: The majority of the selected patients agreed to participate after informed consent. An intervention was implemented containing interpersonal techniques, reattribution, clarification, and structuring. GP compliance with recommendations was 100 percent, patient compliance 75 percent. Conclusion: A standardized psychiatric consultation for somatizing patients in a family practice setting can be implemented. Several levels of implementation can be distinguished.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document