Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (9) ◽  
pp. 1141-1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Haueter ◽  
T. Schütz ◽  
D. A. Raptis ◽  
P.-A. Clavien ◽  
M. Zuber
2015 ◽  
Vol 262 (5) ◽  
pp. 728-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Lurje ◽  
Dimitri Aristotle Raptis ◽  
Daniel Christian Steinemann ◽  
Iakovos Amygdalos ◽  
Patryk Kambakamba ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-481
Author(s):  
Júverson Alves Terra Júnior ◽  
Guilherme Azevedo Terra ◽  
Marisa de Carvalho Borges ◽  
Tharsus Dias Takeuti ◽  
Luciana Garcia Pereira Castro ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fernando Athayde MADUREIRA ◽  
Cristiane Luzia Teixeira GOMEZ ◽  
Eduardo Monteiro ALMEIDA

ABSTRACT Background: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. Aim: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. Methods: A total of 57 patients were randomly divided into two groups and submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=29) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single access (n=28). The patients were followed up and reviewed in a 40.4 month follow-up for identification of incisional hernias. Results: Follow-up showed 21,4% of incisional hernia in single port group and 3.57% in conventional technique. Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of late incisional hernia in patients submitted to single port access cholecystectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document