scholarly journals Cosmesis and Body Image in Patients Undergoing Single-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 262 (5) ◽  
pp. 728-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Lurje ◽  
Dimitri Aristotle Raptis ◽  
Daniel Christian Steinemann ◽  
Iakovos Amygdalos ◽  
Patryk Kambakamba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic

scholarly journals Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-481
Author(s):  
Júverson Alves Terra Júnior ◽  
Guilherme Azevedo Terra ◽  
Marisa de Carvalho Borges ◽  
Tharsus Dias Takeuti ◽  
Luciana Garcia Pereira Castro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic

scholarly journals COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Athayde MADUREIRA ◽  
Cristiane Luzia Teixeira GOMEZ ◽  
Eduardo Monteiro ALMEIDA
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Port Access

ABSTRACT Background: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. Aim: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. Methods: A total of 57 patients were randomly divided into two groups and submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=29) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single access (n=28). The patients were followed up and reviewed in a 40.4 month follow-up for identification of incisional hernias. Results: Follow-up showed 21,4% of incisional hernia in single port group and 3.57% in conventional technique. Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of late incisional hernia in patients submitted to single port access cholecystectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COSMETIC OUTCOME BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY & SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Ashok Kaundal ◽  
Suneet Katoch
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
The Body ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
P Value ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Aim: Comparative analysis of cosmetic outcome between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Method:  Patients suffering from symptomatic cholelithasis were randomly subjected to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional four ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (cLC). Data analyzed included cosmetic outcome, Results: The body image score for SILC group ranged from 30 to 44 with mean score of 40.76 ± 2.773 while that for cLC group ranged from 33 to 42 with mean score of 38.28 ± 1.969. p-value for the comparison stands 0.001 which shows that patients undergoing SILC had better cosmetic perception of their body image compared to cLC group Conclusion: SILC is better cosmetic perception as compare to cLC Keywords: SILC, cLC, Cosmetic outcome

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document