How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk‐adjusted financial performance?

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1975-1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Gangi ◽  
Lucia Michela Daniele ◽  
Nicola Varrone
Author(s):  
Deniz Akbulut ◽  
Metin Enes Dönmez

As with all their assets, organizations need management when it comes to their reputation. Having a successful corporate reputation is closely related to how corporations manage their existing reputation. The main components of long-term corporate reputation are categorized as appealing to emotions, product and service quality, vision and leadership, financial performance, workplace environment and social responsibility (Fombrun et al., 2013: 253). Among these components, financial performance is positioned as one of the main factors that come to the fore especially in crisis situations. Financial performance is also an effective factor in building trust in all relationships established with the target audience. Therefore, organizations should reflect their financial performance with a good corporate communication strategy in order to create a solid corporate reputation based on trust. The Covid-19 pandemic, which affected the whole world in 2019, negatively affected many corporations in Turkey economically. In the face of this situation, which can be described as a global crisis, corporations carried out corporate communication activities that support corporate reputation management in order to turn the crisis into an opportunity. It is seen that especially the financial performances of the corporations are highlighted among these activities carried out with the aim of strengthening the positive image of the corporations in the eyes of their stakeholders and the public. Within the scope of this research, the press releases published by five companies operating within the automotive sector in Turkey, among the sectors given in the Sectoral Impact of Covid 19 on the Economy report of Global Times (2020), were examined through the content analysis method in the context of financial performance indicators. The purpose of the research is to reveal how organizations reflect their strategies, which include the elements that reflect their financial performance in their press releases, to the public. As a result of the research, the financial performance indicator that took the most place in all the press releases examined was determined as “competitive advantage”.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
M. M. D. De S. Gunawardena ◽  
R. Senathiraja ◽  
S. Buvanendra

Amidst empirical evidence that claim corporate reputation affects subsequent financial performance of firms, the literature does not provide a comprehensive explanation for this relationship. The aim of this article therefore is to provide a theoretical explanation on how corporate reputation affects the subsequent financial performance. The available literature supports that corporate reputation signals trustworthiness of firms, based on which stakeholders make decisions such as to trust a firm and allocate valuable, scarce resources. The resources so allocated would help a firm to achieve its objectives, including targeted financial performance in subsequent years. In order to explain the role of trust in the relationship between corporate reputation and subsequent financial performance, the researchers combine two extensively referred models from the reputation and trust literature, the model of reputation-financial performance dynamics and the proposed model of organizational trust. The signaling theory and the stakeholder theory provide the theoretical explanation for the new model proposed.


1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-144
Author(s):  
Richard Peters ◽  
Peggy Golden

As academic and practitioners continue to demand greater stakeholder acknowledgementand engagement, firms must seek ways to move beyond dyadic interactionsand treat internal and external stakeholders as components of a holisticnetwork. This paper introduces two new constructs, Network Diversity and NetworkConsistency, proposing that both the variety of stakeholder partners (Network Diversity)as well as the uniformity of social performance across multiple stakeholderconstituencies (Network Consistency), will influence Corporate Reputation (CR)and ultimately, firm financial performance. Using a sample of 158 firms, across afive year time span,we find that while Network Diversity has no significant relationshipto CR, Network Consistency is in fact related to Corporate Reputation. Further,high levels of Network Diversity may actually detract from, rather than enhancefinancial performance, via increased cost and relationship management complexity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document