scholarly journals The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Annis Hammond ◽  
John W. Slocum
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Li ◽  
Qun Wu ◽  
Clyde W. Holsapple ◽  
Thomas Goldsby

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the impact of three critical dimensions of supply chain resilience, supply chain preparedness, supply chain alertness and supply chain agility, all aimed at increasing a firm’s financial outcomes. In a turbulent environment, firms require resilience in their supply chains to prepare for potential changes, detect changes and respond to actual changes, thus providing superior value. Design/methodology/approach Using survey data from 77 firms, this study develops scales for preparedness, alertness and agility. It then tests their hypothesized relationships with a firm’s financial performance. Findings The results reveal that the three dimensions of supply chain resilience (i.e. preparedness, alertness and agility) significantly impact a firm’s financial performance. It is also found that supply chain preparedness, as a proactive resilience capability, has a greater influence on a firm’s financial performance than the reactive capabilities including alertness and agility, suggesting that firms should pay more attention to proactive approaches for building supply chain resilience. Originality/value First, this study develops a comparatively comprehensive definition for supply chain resilience and explores its dimensionality. Second, this study provides empirically validated instruments for the dimensions of supply chain resilience. Third, this study is one of the first to provide empirical evidence for direct impact of supply chain resilience dimensions on a firm’s financial performance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 3643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elif Akben-Selcuk

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement on firm financial performance in a developing country, Turkey, and to analyze the moderating role of ownership concentration in the CSR–financial performance relationship. The sample consists of non-financial public firms listed on the Borsa Istanbul (BIST)-100 index and covers the period between 2014 and 2018. Empirical results using an instrumental variable approach show that corporate social responsibility has a positive relationship with financial performance. Furthermore, findings indicate that this relationship is negatively moderated by ownership concentration even when endogeneity is controlled for.


1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-144
Author(s):  
Richard Peters ◽  
Peggy Golden

As academic and practitioners continue to demand greater stakeholder acknowledgementand engagement, firms must seek ways to move beyond dyadic interactionsand treat internal and external stakeholders as components of a holisticnetwork. This paper introduces two new constructs, Network Diversity and NetworkConsistency, proposing that both the variety of stakeholder partners (Network Diversity)as well as the uniformity of social performance across multiple stakeholderconstituencies (Network Consistency), will influence Corporate Reputation (CR)and ultimately, firm financial performance. Using a sample of 158 firms, across afive year time span,we find that while Network Diversity has no significant relationshipto CR, Network Consistency is in fact related to Corporate Reputation. Further,high levels of Network Diversity may actually detract from, rather than enhancefinancial performance, via increased cost and relationship management complexity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-58
Author(s):  
NURFATANAH ABDULLAH

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm financial performance in Malaysia. This study is mainly focusing on four sections of corporate governance which are board independent, board size, the frequency of audit committee meeting and firm size. The population of this study is Top 30 firms in Malaysia that are public listed in Bursa Malaysia while for the period, this study focusses on year 2016 to 2019 which is 4 years. This study uses Return on Assets (ROA) to measure the firm effectiveness and efficiency. As for statistical analysis, this study uses E-View to run all the test such as Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test, Hausman Test, Ordinary Least Squared (OLS) method, Autocorrelation, Multicollinearity and Normality Test. According to the results of the analysis, board independent has positive insignificant relationship with firm performances while board size and firm performances have negative and insignificant relationship. As for the frequency of audit committee meeting and firm size, the results display that both variables have negatively significant relationship with the performances of the firm. Apart from that this study use two theory which are Prospect Theory and Agency Theory.


Author(s):  
Nguyen Thanh Dat Nguyen

The paper aims to investigate the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices on the financial performance of oil and gas firms in Asian countries by using a panel data set that includes 23 firms from 7 Asian countries from 2004 to 2017. The empirical results support the research hypothesis that CSR practices have a negative impact on the financial performance of oil and gas companies. This means CSR practices may impose a substantial burden on firms in the oil and gas industry. In addition, we find that different CSR practices have different sizes of impact on firm financial performance. In particular, environment practice has the biggest impact, social practice ranks second, and governance practice has the weakest impact. The main results are also confirmed by several robustness tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document