Safe Zones for Cerclage Wiring of the Humeral Diaphysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 552-557
Author(s):  
Assaf Kadar ◽  
Joseph B. Kahan ◽  
Michael P. Leslie ◽  
Brad J. Yoo ◽  
Michael R. Baumgaertner

2017 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theerachai Apivatthakakul ◽  
P. Siripipattanamongkol ◽  
Chang-Wug Oh ◽  
K. Sananpanich ◽  
C. Phornphutkul


Author(s):  
Samuel Andrew Hardy

Abstract Rescue has long been a defense for the removal of cultural property. Since the explosion of iconoclasm in West Asia, North Africa, and West Africa, there has been a growing demand for cultural property in danger zones to be “rescued” by being purchased and given “asylum” in “safe zones” (typically, in the market countries of Western Europe and North America). This article reviews evidence from natural experiments with the “rescue” of looted antiquities and stolen artifacts from across Asia and Europe. Unsurprisingly, the evidence reaffirms that “rescue” incentivizes looting, smuggling, and corruption, as well as forgery, and the accompanying destruction of knowledge. More significantly, “rescue” facilitates the laundering of “ordinary” illicit assets and may contribute to revenue streams of criminal organizations and violent political organizations; it may even weaken international support for insecure democracies. Ultimately, “rescue” by purchase appears incoherent, counter-productive, and dangerous for the victimized communities that it purports to support.



2019 ◽  
pp. 112070001987482
Author(s):  
Arthur J Kievit ◽  
Johannes G G Dobbe ◽  
Wouter H Mallee ◽  
Leendert Blankevoort ◽  
Geert J Streekstra ◽  
...  

Introduction: We tested whether a mechanical device (such as Hipsecure) to pinpoint the anterior pelvic plane (APP) as a guide can improve acetabular cup placement. To assess accuracy we asked: (1) is the APP an effective guide to position acetabular cup placement within acceptable ° of divergence from the optimal 40° inclination and 15° anteversion; (2) could a mechanical device increase the number of acetabular cup placements within Lewinnek’s safe zone (i.e. inclination 30° to 50°; anteversion 5° to 25°)? Methods: 16 cadaveric specimens were used to assess the 3D surgical success of using a mechanical device APP to guide acetabular cup placement along the APP. We used the Hipsecure mechanical device to implant acetabular cups at 40° inclination and 15° anteversion. Subequently, all cadaveric specimens with implants were scanned with a CT and 3D models were created of the pelvis and acetabular cups to assess the outcome in terms of Lewinnek’s safe zones. Results: The mean inclination of the 16 implants was 40.6° (95% CI, 37.7–43.4) and the mean anteversion angle was 13.4° (95% CI, 10.7–16.1). All 16 cup placements were within Lewinnek’s safe zone for inclination (between 30° and 50°) and all but 2 were within Lewinnek’s safe zone for anteversion (between 5° and 25°). Conclusion: In cadaveric specimens, the use of a mechanical device and the APP as a guide for acetabular cup placement resulted in good positioning with respect to both of Lewinnek’s safe zones.



2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-483
Author(s):  
Ryuya Ochi ◽  
Tetsuo Nakano ◽  
Kazuki Miyazono ◽  
Tomohiro Fukuda ◽  
Daisuke Inaba ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Araujo Valadares ◽  
Paulo Schiavom Duarte ◽  
Eduardo Bechtloff Woellner ◽  
George Barberio Coura-Filho ◽  
Marcelo Tatit Sapienza ◽  
...  

Objective: To analyze standardized uptake values (SUVs) using three different tube current intensities for attenuation correction on 18FNaF PET/CT scans. Materials and Methods: A total of 254 18F-NaF PET/CT studies were analyzed using 10, 20 and 30 mAs. The SUVs were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on three skeletal regions, namely, right proximal humeral diaphysis (RH), right proximal femoral diaphysis (RF), and first lumbar vertebra (LV1) in a total of 712 VOIs. The analyses covered 675 regions classified as normal (236 RH, 232 RF, and 207 LV1). Results: Mean SUV for each skeletal region was 3.8, 5.4 and 14.4 for RH, RF, and LV1, respectively. As the studies were grouped according to mAs value, the mean SUV values were 3.8, 3.9 and 3.7 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RH region; 5.4, 5.5 and 5.4 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RF region; 13.8, 14.9 and 14.5 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the LV1 region. Conclusion: The three tube current values yielded similar results for SUV calculation.



Injury ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 917-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsi-Hsien Lin ◽  
Shih-Hsin Hung ◽  
Yu-Ping Su ◽  
Fang-Yao Chiu ◽  
Chien-Lin Liu


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document