scholarly journals Long‐term follow‐up of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients with an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Yin ◽  
Ligang Ding ◽  
Yuqiu Li ◽  
Wei Hua
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Sasaki

The EMBLEM™ entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) system (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) was introduced as a new alternative to the conventional transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and has been expected to reduce device-related complications, especially in young patients who require long-term lead placement. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a well-known hereditary disease recognized as a cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young adults. However, the precise clinical role of S-ICD in patients with ARVC remains to be defined because of the low QRS amplitude of subcutaneous electrocardiogram (S-ECG) followed by the high incidence of inappropriate shock (IAS) delivery due to oversensing. It is well known that the sensing of S-ICD is largely dependent on the QRS/T ratio of S-ECG. The decrease in the QRS amplitude is more likely to lead to oversensing such as T wave or myopotential oversensing. In patients with ARVC, the decrease in the QRS amplitude due to degeneration of the right ventricular myocardium progresses overtime. In this chapter, we would like to discuss the usefulness of S-ICD lead repositioning for young adult patients with ARVC based on our experience of patients with IAS.


Author(s):  
Julia Cadrin-Tourigny ◽  
Laurens P. Bosman ◽  
Weijia Wang ◽  
Rafik Tadros ◽  
Aditya Bhonsale ◽  
...  

Background - Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). A model was recently developed to predict incident sustained VA in ARVC patients. However, since this outcome may overestimate the risk for SCD, we aimed to specifically predict life-threatening VA (LTVA) as a closer surrogate for SCD. Methods - We assembled a retrospective cohort of definite ARVC cases from 15 centers in North America and Europe. Association of 8 pre-specified clinical predictors with LTVA (SCD, aborted SCD, sustained or ICD treated VT>250 bpm) in follow-up was assessed by Cox regression with backward selection. Candidate variables included age, sex, prior sustained VA (≥30s, hemodynamically unstable or ICD treated VT; or aborted SCD), syncope, 24-hour premature ventricular complexes (PVC) count, the number of anterior and inferior leads with T-wave inversion (TWI), left and right ventricular ejection fraction. The resulting model was internally validated using bootstrapping. Results - A total of 864 definite ARVC patients (40±16 years; 53% male) were included. Over 5.75 years [IQR 2.77, 10.58] of follow-up, 93 (10.8%) patients experienced LTVA including 15 with SCD/aborted SCD (1.7%). Of the 8 pre-specified clinical predictors, only 4 (younger age, male sex, PVC count and number of leads with TWI) were associated with LTVA. Notably, prior sustained VA did not predict subsequent LTVA (p=0.850). A model including only these 4 predictors had an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.74 (95% CI:0.69-0.80) and calibration slope of 0.95 (95% CI:0.94-0.98) indicating minimal over-optimism. Conclusions - LTVA events in patients with ARVC can be predicted by a novel simple prediction model using only 4 clinical predictors. Prior sustained VA and the extent of functional heart disease are not associated with subsequent LTVA events.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 750-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHENG-HUNG LI ◽  
YENN-JIANG LIN ◽  
JIN-LONG HUANG ◽  
TSU-JUEY WU ◽  
CHEN-CHUAN CHENG ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document