scholarly journals Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer

Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (12) ◽  
pp. 2230-2239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alana R. Donaldson ◽  
Shashirekha Shetty ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Christine L. Rivera ◽  
Bryce P. Portier ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (11) ◽  
pp. 1250-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Press ◽  
Ivonne Villalobos ◽  
Angela Santiago ◽  
Roberta Guzman ◽  
Monica Cervantes ◽  
...  

Context.— Evaluation of HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was changed by recent American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) guidelines. Objective.— To determine frequencies and assess patterns of HER2 protein expression for each ASCO-CAP guideline FISH category among 7526 breast cancers accrued to our consultation practice. Design.— We retrospectively reevaluated the HER2 FISH status of breast cancers in our consultation practice according to ASCO-CAP FISH guidelines, and documented HER2 protein levels in each category. Results.— —According to new guidelines, 17.7% of our consultation breast cancers were “ISH-positive” with HER2:CEP17 FISH ratios ≥2.0 and average HER2 gene copies per cell ≥4.0 (group 1); 0.4% were “ISH-positive” with ratios ≥2.0 and average copies <4.0 (group 2); 0.6% were “ISH-positive” with ratios <2.0 and average copies ≥6.0 (group 3); 4.6% were “ISH-equivocal” with ratios <2.0 and average copies ≥4.0 and <6.0 (group 4); and 76.7% were “ISH-negative” with ratios <2.0 and average copies <4.0 (group 5). However, only groups 1 (HER2 amplified) and 5 (HER2 not amplified) agreed with our previously reported status, and only these groups demonstrated the expected immunohistochemistry status, overexpression and low expression, respectively. Groups 2 and 4 breast cancers lacked overexpression, whereas group 3 was not significantly associated with either increased or decreased HER2 expression. Conclusions.— Although the status of approximately 95% of our cases (groups 1 and 5) is not affected by the new guidelines, those of the other 5% (groups 2–4) conflict with previous HER2 gene amplification status and with HER2 status by immunohistochemistry.


2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Elna Moerland ◽  
Rens L. H. P. M. van Hezik ◽  
Toine C. J. M. van der Aa ◽  
Mike W. P. M. van Beek ◽  
Adriaan J. C. van den Brule

In this study the detection of HER2 gene amplification was evaluated using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH; PathVysion) in comparison with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a PCR based technique. These two methods were evaluated on a series of 46 formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast carcinomas, previously tested for protein overexpression by HercepTest (grouped into Hercep 1+, 2+ and 3+). HER2 gene amplification (ratio ≥ 2.0) by FISH was found in 9/10, 10/30 and 0/6 in IHC 3+, 2+ and 1+/0 cases, respectively. Digitalized automated spot counting performed with recently developed CW4000 CytoFISH software was 100% concordant with manual FISH scoring. Using MLPA 18/46 samples showed a clear HER2 amplification. Comparing MLPA and IHC showed the same results as for FISH and IHC. All but one FISH positive cases (18/19) were confirmed by MLPA for the presence of the gene amplification. The overall concordance of detection of Her2 gene amplification by FISH and MLPA was 98% (45/46). Furthermore, both the level of amplification and equivocal results correlated well between both methods. In conclusion, MLPA is a reliable and reproducible technique and can be used as an either alternative or additional test to determine HER2 status in breast carcinomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document