Are all narratives the same: Convergent and discriminant validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale—Global Rating Method across two narrative types

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenelle M. Slavin‐Mulford ◽  
Luke R. Amerson ◽  
Mark J. Hilsenroth ◽  
Jennifer Zodan ◽  
Jocelyn W. Charnas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
The Social ◽  
Rating Method

Exploring the Factor Structure of the Social Cognition and Object Relations–Global Rating Method: Support for Two- and Three-Factor Models

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb J. Siefert ◽  
Michelle Stein ◽  
Jenelle Slavin-Mulford ◽  
Greg Haggerty ◽  
Samuel J. Sinclair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Factor Models ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
The Social ◽  
Rating Method ◽  
Three Factor

The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global Rating Method (SCORS-G)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle B Stein ◽  
Jenelle Slavin-Mulford
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
The Social ◽  
Rating Method

Card pull effects of the Thematic Apperception Test using the Social Cognition and Object Relations‐Global Rating Method on complex psychiatric sample

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M. Ridenour ◽  
Katie C. Lewis ◽  
Caleb J. Siefert ◽  
Seth R. Pitman ◽  
Daniel Knauss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Thematic Apperception Test ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
The Social ◽  
Thematic Apperception ◽  
Rating Method

Stimulus Characteristics in Picture Story Exercise Cards and Their Effects on the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-258
Author(s):  
Emily T. O’Gorman ◽  
Haley R. Cobb ◽  
Liana R. Galtieri ◽  
John E. Kurtz
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
The Social ◽  
Picture Story Exercise ◽  
Rating Method ◽  
Picture Story

How Narrative Source Impacts Convergence of Ratings From the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale ‐ Global Rating Method with Psychotherapy Process Measures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenelle M. Slavin‐Mulford ◽  
Luke R. Amerson ◽  
Lylli A. Cain ◽  
Mark J. Hilsenroth ◽  
Melanie M. Wilcox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Psychotherapy Process ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Process Measures ◽  
The Social ◽  
Rating Method

Exploring the Construct Validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in a Clinical Sample

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 533-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle B. Stein ◽  
Jenelle Slavin-Mulford ◽  
S. Justin Sinclair ◽  
Caleb J. Siefert ◽  
Mark A. Blais
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
The Social

Reliability and validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in clinical use

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 617-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Peters ◽  
Mark J. Hilsenroth ◽  
Erin M. Eudell-Simmons ◽  
Matthew D. Blagys ◽  
Leonard Handler
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Object Relations ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
The Social

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of the Social Comparison Motives Scale

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Baldwin Tigges
Keyword(s):  
Social Comparison ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Principal Axis ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Oblique Rotation ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
The Social ◽  
Principal Axis Factor Analysis

This article describes the 19-item Social Comparison Motive Scale [SCMS], a measure of adolescents’ motives for social comparison related to pregnancy. Dimensions and items were developed based on adolescent focus groups. The instrument was reviewed for content validity, pilot tested, and administered to 431 adolescents aged 14–18 years. Principal axis factor analysis with oblique rotation supported five dimensions. Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated by moderate correlations (r = .50) between the SCMS and the Iowa–Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure and low correlations (r = .15) between the SCMS and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Cronbach’s alphas were .91 overall and .71 to .85 for the subscales. The SCMS demonstrated reliability and validity as a measure of adolescents’ motives for comparing themselves with others about pregnancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document